We know your intentions. We take responsibility and avoid your spaces, due to religious entitlement and abuse in the reverse. I still believe, and that, scientifically speaking, means I'll never leave my beliefs.
I am opposed to any child abuse, meaning whatever the child perceives as such. I am opposed to all forms of abuse except certain forms of parent abuse that operate within the realm of the law, and serve a defensive purpose for a minor child and/or advocates a neglected need.
Anyone who identifies as belonging to the criminal gang Foursquare will be shunned, and everything they say apart from their childhood experiences discarded, and even their childhood experiences when used to manipulate.
Robbyn is in the clear, meaning she's done nothing wrong at this point. That's all you have to do, members such as Tia Brown - be honest, come forward, and accept the fact that you were wrong, in this case that Robbyn means danger. Apparently, the leadership of that group is triangulate me against a fellow colleague who I fully respect. You will not overthrow Robbyn, and neither will I as long as she doesn't attack me to a certain intolerable degree.
Even if I am here on false pretenses, I am a Calvinistic Christian, meaning great good can arise from great evil, meaning you're never going to get me to leave. Question my existence a bit? Yes, but I'm here, and reality is reality, so deal with it.
I stand by Robbyn is she is a co-enlist in adversarial format to me, and not an abuser. Come comment on this page, shall you? Foursquare.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.