My view on the sexually entitled infiltrators

 Many here do not understand my view on the sexually entitled infiltrators. It is a nuanced issue. Not all cases of infiltrating pedophile are clear cut, and I do not trust anyone's data blindly. I hear from all sources, then make a decision for myself.    

The ones who came before me either were narcissists or else had one. The bulk of them were criminal narcissists - basically thugs emerging from shadows, whose teeth were gritted and chathing as they raped and sexually assaulted our survivors, like a conveyor belt. They undoubtedly deserved to be kicked out.

Over the years, spanning roughly 1970-2000, we have had attacks from trauma haters and disability predators who defend the right to exploit the trauma of survivors and their children. These are skinheads misusing my psychiatric label, "pedophilia", and turning it into a "sport", which it is not. It is a mental illness, and something that needs the attention of a mental health professional.

Most all took the advice of a "trauma counselor" at anti-children's rights, meaning usually Focus on the 
Family. Anti-CR is a role-playing, meaning grooming agency, going by the acronym of pro-social terrorism. I refused to take the advice of my trauma counselor, nor did I hear her, but she said I was "doomed from day one, and would be marked for deletion soon, so give up the fight now". They were basically used as political tools and projectiles against a valid target. I took out that target. Blake is not here. It isn't something I boast about even to myself. It just had to be done. It's called pro-social trauma...Blake is scared of me, like I'm chuck-E. So, I leave him alone.

The only reason I came forward about my condition is that I knew of an "open slot" in the children's rights community, and interpreted it as an open position in the movement. Think the lonely writer, who is nerdy and technical, but in a way centered around children. He was not supposed to be social with everyone, but be introverted. We can have as many of these clinical informational pedophiles as we please, and pedophiles are still allowed to make hidden disclosures of their condition (we delete them or they delete them after the conversation is over). We are not the haters of pedophiles like we used to be. These policies have been on the books, and since the advent of Virtuous Pedophiles, they have been implemented more readily...I pictured a blueprint when coming into the movement as a pedophile.

My goal here...to change the abuser locator to title-based brands (ex. parent, adult) instead of brands based in mental health identity, meaning we say "sexually abusive parent" instead of "pedophile". That's all I want, and everything will flow from that change, leading to a spanking ban once people see pedophiles electing to abstain from harming and abusing children. Like dominoes, starting with pedophiles and ending with parents. Most pedophiles I know don't spank. I hate GirlChat, but I can't help but marvel at how they deal with pro-spanking spoogs. Cuff 'em, book 'em, lock 'em up, once we criminalize 'em. No punishment is reasonable. Pedophiles abstain first, and parents last.