How I would classify Robbyn, Amy, and Nadine - intermittent abuser

 I believe that things aren't as clear cut as leftist children's rights advocates believe in term of a clear line between narcissist and victim. Most people are victims, yet most adults abuse - children. Should we treat them more humanely? No. Exploit their victimhood to get evidence and hold them accountable.

Robbyn is an intermittent abuser, by my self-observation, meaning she goes into phases where she's fine, then she abuses me once she's off her medication. These are cases that she could easily ask for information, then decide for herself the credibility of the information. 

She has a pedophile existence trauma, which means she was very badly hurt by a pedophile. I do care, but only away from her, and don't know what the answer is, and shouldn't be put in that position...And there lies the grievance. She trusts me enough to ask "are you going to attack me?" yet doesn't take my word at face value. So, ask someone else, meaning someone who can give you an objective answer. Like, everyone else here. Maybe my doctors - except she puts up a wall to people who can reassure her. I just don't get it. 

Yes, I talk calmly about ABUSERS this way. Abusers have problems too, but they need to be responsible and seek help, instead of victimizing others with their abuse. I actually do believe in restorative justice, but may use pro-social hyperbole to demonstrate that I am angry at abuse. An entitled abuser, in another context - the medical context - is a mental patient who refuses to seek help for their issues, is toxic, and infects others with their toxicity. Some people are well, then their medication tapers off, then they go back to abusing others. This is, on the surface, a medical issue, before the fact, but once someone plots against their neighbor, that's it - that's when we start treating them like the scum that they are.

I want abusers to get help, if at all possible, and simply stop abusing. Victims aren't "lying to get good men in trouble", but simply want the abuse to stop in most cases, particularly with children. The parents in an abusive home need to be broken down to the lowest level, with them crying for mercy with "What have I done?" and "I need answers", in which case my anti-parent predation would turn off. It is an angry garden hose, yet I challenge you to go behind the bushes and switch it off...Pro-social V, where we break parents down, then build them back up.

I actually was not on any mission to take out Robbyn, even if others hoped with dice rolling. I abdicated, because we need a movement to protect children. I am not opposed to the movement at all, and actually find the insinuation a bit insulting. More like accusing a conservative of hating this country. I tried to be polite, but children's rights will prevail, and the gentle parenting saints will rule all of earth, and all child abuse will be annihilated on the last day...I do think this movement often caters to parents too much, but that is due to the makeup of this country, not the movement.