The police want me to violate my religion

 ...And write smut about different girls I was attracted to. I refuse. His agenda, however, is not in favor of the victim (which others can say better), but turning this into a bloodbath to get me out of children's rights.

I am made aware that this is an anti-children's rights investigation. Anti-children's rights has an agenda, and that is for certain advocates to be taken out, or else "go home", which I won't, because the First Amendment allows for freedom of both speech and assembly. Yes, First Amendment does apply to the government, but the fact of the matter is that the police propping these thugs up constitutes a breach of police authority under the First (deleted "fourth") Amendment.

No, I'm not going to gaslight survivors while being one, so kill me now, since I know you are too much of a coward to do so, John T. Adams. I relinquish titles when they aren't earned. You've got to earn the title "district attorney", my friend, and it takes more than votes. I hope I get to vote you out if that's the case (he usually runs unopposed).

"He doesn't want out" Yep, that's right. You'd have to know what a pedophile is, by the clinical standard, to understand why an interest in children's rights would be genuine - children's rights is about children's equality to adults, whereas a pedophile sees a child as an equal. In forensic psychology, they are a specific category of child sexual abuser that is pathetic and self-victimizing in their excuses, and wants to be friends with a child in an inappropriate fashion, usually lacking social skills, and usually having developmental issues such as autism or ADHD. My point is that most clinical pedophiles are victims of abuse, and fall on the victim prong, so I advocate using another term besides "pedophile". How about every nasty name in the book besides the P-label.