Why pedophilia will never be acceptable as an active sexual orientation

I am a pedophile, meaning the clinical informational pedophile here in the children's rights community. A clinical informational pedophile self-advocate is a specific type of pedophile that is easy for others to care about and sympathize with, meaning one that fixates on children's issues, usually from a legal or moral legal standpoint, and then joins a movement like ours. This might cause pity among some of the more liberal members of this community. It's called "healthy pedophilia", and there is nothing healthy about it. It came from this movement, and we will end it.

It is a form of abuse because, even if the child truly enjoys it, it violates the sexual purity values that our country was founded upon, in which case God's Law is above the law of the land, and there is to be no sex outside of marriage. We must return to these norms, and when that happens, things will be simplified and there will be less sex crime. I oppose sexual thoughtcrime, however, meaning its existence...And the existence of thoughtcrime as an option proves no reason for a pedophile to involve a real child, no matter how much they "can't help it", because thoughtcrimes of the sexual self-stimulatory sort aren't crimes at all, when kept in the human mind. 

Virtuous, non-offending pedophiles, tend to be more conservative and conformist on issues related to the age of consent than many more ultra-progressive children's rights advocates, who may pity me, and wish for an outlet for me other than fantasy. Some of it is just wishes that go nowhere, and some is plans to recommendations to recommend "healthy pedophilia"...but what if the child is frightened at the end. Yes, and they don't know where they are if they are young children. That is abuse, just because the child feels uncomfortable. But, it is abuse regardless because the biblical purpose of sex is to create a marriage, and there should be none with a child, because the child cannot take on the burden of marriage, even if the secular laws allow so.

Sexual fantasy should be accepted, to the point where parents don't shame and punish their children, indirectly or directly, for being pedophiles and sexually fantasizing about children. However, my Christian beliefs call for a curtain between fantasy life and real life, meaning they are deemed entirely different. You don't verbally describe fantasies anywhere, meaning you just feel them, then move on...Morally speaking, I don't care where I go too much in fantasy, and am more concerned about where I go in real life. Which one would you think is more important? If you say the former, I question how much you really respect children.

It is unfortunate, from the most objective view, that I would have to fantasize about children, but it is something I shouldn't focus on, to avoid self-pity, which may lead to excuses in the form of self-pity if I were to rationalize. Allow others to feel bad about me having the condition. But, sexual fantasy is what it means to be a pedophile, meaning capacity for it, at the core. Sexual fantasies don't mean you will do it, but might replicate situations to avoid in real life - pleasurable reminder. Also, it is an alternative, much like turning time-out into something for the parents to retreat to, not the children.

I say "active sexual orientation" because, medically speaking, at the lowest level, pedophilia IS a sexual orientation, but an unfortunate one, and one that can never be acted upon. Pedophilia will never be okay, but being a pedophile always was okay, when identifying on clinical/medical terms, to parents, therapist, and/or a support system. Such systems should be in place to prevent parents/pedophiles from abusing children.