Wednesday, March 31, 2021

"Alienation videos": Why I often make false testimony against fellow survivors

 False testimony alone isn't perjury, but it is close - insisting on a factually false moral legal narrative. Sometimes, in gaslighting situations, this can get complicated. 

"Alientation videos" are a way to get advocates to blame each other. This is a anti-children's rights to cause conflict and isolate children's rights advocates, then blaming either the movement or removing an advocate from visibility/activity.

This is not your fault, anyone. Just state in the exchange what year you recorded what you did. I am learning to tell on my own that some background contexts don't match up to the modern context, which would be at a police station.

If you have no clue why I am attacking you, know that I could have a very clear idea that ultimately was a controversy then, not now. My policing instincts are predation instincts, but factoid driven. You have to run up a ramp in a reassuring way with exonerating facts. My bias, meaning personal bias, is to keep every advocate here, as they are, and leave as little of a footprint as possible...And that means I wanted this to end like a lamb, which isn't going to happen.

Think windmill. Just state the facts, including "I don't know why you are bringing this up? This happened in 2017". The tape obscures that fact until the last part, with "rascal" gaslighting that I just roll my eyes at. So immature, they are over there at anti-children's rights.

On another note, suicide is murder, according to my Christian beliefs. Murder in relation to the community. "Take it all out and do it all at once". We will assume that is a homicidal or otherwise menacing statement. "Take it all out" Take my mom and I out as the trash, and "do it all at once" rape us both at a force that could kill. This is a "shut up" threat, in first-to-last format. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Righteous co-sleeping: Why God wants parents to sleep next to their children

Many parents think that co-sleeping is the irresponsible choice for a parent to make. This is a common attitude from American parents. Most ...