Where the parents are right (because a parent is never right)

 ...and if they are right, they aren't really a parent, even if they are. My mother is right because she doesn't brag as something she clearly just is.

I am an anti-parent advocate, and also a pedophile by the clinical definition. I hate them all, and hate how they all victimize themselves for having their "disciplinary rights" taken away. Whip those sick things 40 lashes with the rod of correction on their last supper, before hanging such entitled spoogs up with their tongue sticking out! I love hurting my abuser! So don't mess with my trauma...I don't trust the parents on many things, but I actually do trust them, somewhat, on the sexual abuse. I might be a closeted pro-parent, but I'll never admit to supporting such a graven abusive cause.

Parental rights is about the concept that "parents protect", and that parents have the "right" to protect their child from abuse. Nope. It's a duty, and the fact that "right" is in quotation marks tells you exactly how I see the concept of parents protecting children. It's not "I protect my child" it is YOU SHALL protect your child, even from your own sin nature, coming from a former child that is as flawed as I am. We want you to protect in the sacrificial way that WE protect, without punishment, without control, without violence. Hearken before your child! For your child is your master, and you are righteously enslaved to her, in loving and dutiful bondservice! Praise the Lord for parents being put in their lowly place! I submit anytime! That, what I stated there, is a TRUE protective attitude. There are threats out there, and you call them out when they come, but know you are the number one threat to your child, and work on that instead of wallowing in defensive self-pity.

"Pro-parent" is a vague term, and basically means that you simply are okay with parents existing. This should be an advocacy without a platform, as parents have too many rights already, and are begging for free stuff - from their children, and from society in relation to children. At the lowest level, they aren't the fanged villains I often depict them as, but welfare kings and queens, begging for their right to torment their child. Card reader. "Reasonable chastisement". I like to welfare-ize my abuser many times. I hate their choice of existence, and seek to chop them down like weed-whackers.

But, beneath all that, I might just see myself as a gentle parent to all children. A sparing, liberating one, but with reasonable limits, yet am I really typing this? Certain things should simply be made obvious by example...as for the parents, meaning the lobby, "parents protect" have all they have going for them, and they sure could word it better. *I* have a duty to protect a child, not a right. "Right" implies allowed absence in the reverse, and that's why parental rights sucks. Parental duties? More like that?

Nope, I'll just call myself a pedophile, and choose to be a parent towards children anyway. I am my flaws in relation to children, and am not to brag about my strengths.