Pro-social predation, pro-social chase: Why my trauma protection instincts towards parents are predatory in nature

 Many see pro-social predation, and since I am a pedophile, that scares a lot of people. What does pro-social predation mean? The level of the gaslighting, meaning the pedophile level. I am an enforcer of divine law here, and focus on parents that shouldn't be here. If you are a gentle parent, you are on my saved list, and stay put as parents, whereas all other parents stand out, and are marked for deletion by the Lord, meaning punishment, either by way of secular (when "out of bounds") or otherworldly (lake of fire/Hell).

I am a parent victimization traumatic, and that trauma is conflated with a pedophile. I stymy this urge to pick apart every urge in parenting by a formula of righteous judgment encoded in the Bible, meaning "innocent until proven guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt". I don't like when parents victimize themselves, meaning find their child annoying or maddening in any way - because your child isn't that way to me in the slightest way. A child "mouthing off"? Empowered child. Children misbehave for many, many reasons, and none have anything to do with me. It is developmental immaturity, and exploration stemming from such...I HATE parents make a mountain out of a mole hill. Running in the store? Focus on your loud voice, you entitled spoog. That child has the right to run in the store, and there are no rules against it posted? "I just need control". No, you need to sit down, shut up, and put your child first, and you last. Whiny brats - the parents, I mean. The kids? Absolutely fine. Parents? Picture ghetto. Handgun. Dirty streets. Screaming through screen in rowhouse. Yep, that's about how I see parent-land. And they are afraid of me straying into their little ghetto of children screaming in black and white format and such...I prey on parent anger and victimization.

Basically, anything about how the parent has it bad can trigger my instincts, but I can stop them immediately with facts. If I have no evidence of anything going on, I stop right there, but may squint at what what you post about how "parenting is hard". If you say, "I did lash out, but you have to understand..." I'll take it as entitlement, but not deadly entitlement, meaning I think you do already take responsibility, but need to show it in order to lower my instincts. If you say "I have the right to spank, because I made sure it is gentle", I will turn on you just like everyone else will...My bias is that I want you to be guilty once you show yourself as a parent suddenly, so I can prove the opposite by way of pro-social question/clarify, and pro-social offense/non-offense. This means asking questions from an angle, and you being dumbstruck and quiet, and if you can stay that way, you will see the end of the light of the tunnel, because then I know you are a gentle parent, because only a gentle parent who cares about my trauma would be so submissive to it. You might say "yes, I did lose my cool, and I regret it". Then, case closed right there, because of the language "I regret it" and me being able to tell you aren't copying off of a cheat sheet such as this article, meaning the tone in regards to how genuine both parties are counts - "both parties" because we are talking mutual submission, meaning equal level of culpability. If I am factually wrong in an exchange, and do not apologize, I am guilty of perjury, and sin guilt falls on me. I tell you this self-depricating part because I trust gentle parents, and for pro-social honesty purposes.

I ALWAYS have the right to question your parenting, just like you ALWAYS have the right to question MY risk to children as a pedophile. That is the setup, whether you like it or not.