Many people are now wondering how to answer to Maxwell's divine bench. Many people seem not to know how. It generally receives law, not gives.
Sin guilt in gaslighting is whodunnit in nature, by my strict application based on the strict understanding of guilt. In any exchange, the abuser is the loser, and the victim has the upper hand every time, if not here on earth, than in Heaven.
Most offenses that I would be accused of would be perceptive based offenses, based on the concept what whatever the victim perceives to be abuse is objectively so, until meted out by arbitration between victim/judge and detainee.
Example
Max: Don't speak to my trauma with disrespect
Other person: I have the right to treat you however I want, because you are stinking pedophile
Max: What type of pedophile do you perceive me to be? Some pedophiles do not offend,
Other person: The offender type, and I don't care. One bullet. One cure. Their existence is abuse. Especially the ones that stand out - the virtuous, rainbow flag, leftie type of pedophile. The second death is theirs as well - down the ass, straight.
Max: GTFO of everything. We know you must have something to hide besides trauma, attacking me and my trauma like that. *walks away from screen* *takes a chill pill* *ignores abusers* *be like Max
No trauma survivor would ever attack a pedophile like depicted here. Anyone who attacks me like that has something to hide.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.