How I judge VirPed (and my findings)

The Virtuous Pedophiles community has been the focus of controversy about the existence of my blog. Most there do want me there, but wonder how much I oppose them. I have decided to do another post. I am a righteous judge of ALL adults, but especially parents. I have never referred to anyone at VP as a parent, and there's a reason why - most pedophiles there aren't abusers, and if they are, remorseful abusers.

Christians are called to judge the world, and put the world on trial. This is what is called righteous judgment. It says in John 7:24 KJV:

Judge not accordance to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.

The Greek root word translated "judge" and "judgment" involves κρινο (Latin: krinó) and refers to courtroom judgment of a circular sort, suspect abuse and evil in all adults, knowing that all adults are wicked and evil in relation to children, deserving of PUNISHMENT and ERASE if not repentant. We at Ban Adult Entitlement was nihil child, meaning only children, with admitted survivors being culpable in reformatory, rehabilitative format, by way of self-control and self-discipline, and this includes self-identified pedophiles. It is a telephone line that a few of us adults have found, climbing straight up to Heaven and that City in the Sky.

I do "innocent" framing with all pedophiles, meaning all pedophiles that identify, either by hint or "come out". Generally, when an adult is vulnerable about something that low-level. If a pedophile lets onto something, use pro-social worry tactics to express worry to get information, assuming any surface-level abuse indicated will lead to restorative justice, meaning guilty yet not guilty. If the abuser defends their rights to abuse, a report is made to VP administration. We also make reports on possible infiltrators to VirPed. This caused concern between me, Ethan Edwards, and boogeyman - my understanding was that making a certain level of sexually derogatory language about children was something for the admins to say "that's enough. Can you tone it down a bit?", and I only made a fuss due to the gaslighting nature that seemed to beg for attention, while getting a message that anti-pedophile knew of an infiltrator. I do not agree with my verdict against boogeyman. I do not like how he speaks about children, but since it is on VirPed and not in our group, keep it there and I'm actually okay with it - a support group, with a relaxed tone, but with rules that work.

I am not an anti-pedophile vigilante, but an anti-parent/anti-spanking one. I hate all adults, yet I don't want them to disclose that projectory hatred that is parents to me. I want to be able to tell, and also want them to open up about their flaws, and understate their strengths as a parent. When you say "I am a pedophile", you are being honest about what kind of parent you are. When you say "I am a parent, and I have the right..." I am suspicious, at best. If you say you inflicted such damages onto a child, you're gone. I want none of your existence in my life.

Pedophilia is absolutely never a good thing. Pedophiles often are good people who hate the former just as much due to its potential to harm children. 

PEDOPHILE =/= CHILD ABUSER

PEDOPHILE = ABUSED CHILD/VICTIM

PRO-SPANKING PARENT = ABUSERS OF PEDOPHILES AS WELL