Wednesday, February 24, 2021

For pedophiles: Cheat sheet on how to get in (that doesn't work with infiltrators)

 We need good pedophiles. Only, the only ones here/that come here are the antisocial pedophiles, meaning those with inherent antisocial traits. Many are worried I am being kicked out. There is a certain reason I know I will not be kicked out. The more you internalize, the better you'll fare. My type of autism is basically a children's rights cop in nature, and that makes it very easy for me to internalize the children's rights procedure on who is a "gonner" and who is a "bygonner". Like in most countries, we have never had a bygonner, at least until now.

Children's rights righteous judgment is understood by the statement "innocent until proven guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt", but unlike ordinary "presume" framing (which I use to frame parents), survivors frame pedophiles based on how they present themselves, presuming their judgment about a pedophile is true, and framing the pedophile based on that bias. I am not like that, as an advocate. I do unbiased "presume" framing, with mean-testing of the parents, meaning I don't care who you are or why you do it (apart from restorative justice, when possible), you did it, and if you defend it, you're at the very end of my wick, and you're gone - out either the front door, to the street, or the back door, to the police. I fetishize seeing the parents in handcuffs, with traumatic sadism. I use conservative righteous judgment for that reason. I don't use bias wisely, but center it completely. I am not one to comment on everything in real life like I used to, except in my head. Oh I'll offer, if you'd like, any opinion, but you may not like it, so I be polite, and quieten up.

My perception is flexible, and I can feign projection, meaning I don't literally believe you are doing X to your child on the side, but I accuse you of it, setting the ground rules that if you defend yourself in any way, you will be guilty of perjury and abuse. Usually, that is when you are hiding something in an argument in a way I can't get to. Silence can be defiance, if it is intended as such, and outwardly stated. Non-response can be counted as entitlement against a child. Reverent corner, it is, meaning cornering the parent so that they have to tell the truth...and that's all I want from any parent, is to hear the truth as to what happens in the home, and I can tell what is truth and what is BS.

Ultimately, we are all looking for a diplomatic gesture. The whole point of the "imperfect messiah" is an official duty, and a very humble one - clinical informational pedophile. This is not the office of some king or ruler, and if you are seeking that, get out! Clinical informational pedophiles would disclose as if they were placing themselves into submission to survivors, but more like submission to a doctor's care, assuming this place is a research hospital at some level.

I know, as a fact, that I am going to make it, with hurdles. Most advocates here will simply brush my already hidden and preserved public imagine underground some more. Child advocacy isn't about being famous, but about giving children their rights.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Righteous co-sleeping: Why God wants parents to sleep next to their children

Many parents think that co-sleeping is the irresponsible choice for a parent to make. This is a common attitude from American parents. Most ...