Religious entitlement leading to abuse is a crime against God (1 Cor. 5:11; Rev. 21:8)...(Erin Jacobs cut me off here). I believe in Hell for a reason - there is no justice for children otherwise.
Believe whatever you want, Matthew, but your perspective isn't the only perspective on this planet.
I don't need your "help". Antisocial "help" is a crime against God. You have no right to "help" me without me asking. Did I ask for spiritual guidance? No. You are an anti-pedophile researcher, and so I was submitting to study. I did NOT grow up in the same home you grew up with, and given your current course of conduct now, I get pangs that YOU are plagiarizing MY childhood religious upbringing by falsely crediting all progressive Christians as gentle parents, and all conservative Christians as punitive parents. Everyone spanks their kids, Matthew. Even many Methodists go against the church teaching. This is about entitlement. Feeling like children owe you things, and lashing out based on that. Progressive Christians, to me, seem to have LESS starting ground to come to the conclusion that spanking is wrong, because they tend to be a doubting Thomas sometimes. Nope, if you look up the context completely, you become BOTH conservative AND anti-spanking. Anti-spanking is actually a theologically conservative idea, of the radical, reactionary sort. Thus, both sides can come to agree that children should not be spanked, hit, or punished as a means of above control.
I bring up the pedophilia issue for many reasons, but on the issue of spanking (which is more of a religious issue to me than pedophilia), but the fact of the matter is that the pedophiles are now choosing not to abuse children. Physically aggressive parents next? Down the line (row of children and their allies). Down the lane (parents like dominoes - go down for child abuse).
We are Christians, and We are traumatic pedophiles...(clarified for abuser upon cooperation - use kind words, please).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.