Robbyn, I'm not attracted to you

 Nope, not even close. Too old. You tower over me like a parent, sometimes reassuring, sometimes controlling. When you are controlling, I use reverse gaslighting to quell you and put the parent down, meaning in time-out.

I support your work, but see it as very different from my own in terms of style. You are light anti-spanking, and I am dark anti-spanking. 

Let her in, and mandate her to try out at least one gentle parenting group, because I think she needs to hear from US in terms of advice on how to deal with me, not them. She does not need to speak to me, as I know she is sorry. My beliefs are very pragmatic, in that repentance only requires a genuine expression of remorse, meaning you mean it and accept any repercussions due to your actions, usually natural consequences.

I doubt your testimony in the tape where you say you are becoming pro-spanking, because that is a very strong charge in this community, and any baseless accusations like that are perjorious in nature, and the perpetrators will be shunned...Lying to my court about a false alarm about my abuser. I want to be wrong when spotting a parent, so prove me wrong and get down those defenses, or else I'm sure I've reeled up one to throw out.

Robbyn is not one of the parents, so she should not be co-mingling among them. However, I don't control my abuser. I empower them to take up attitudes of individual responsibility for their parenting choices, and include pedophiles in that. I am a pro-social covert narcissist around the parents, meaning I bring them down to their child's level, so they know the suffering they have caused.

Nobody here, by default, is included in "the parents". That's the other side, meaning once you identify by being one of them, I question everything about you, until you admit that you are wrong in your parenting. Some agencies are both, in which case I tend to include them here, such as the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) and a few other related organizations dedicated to educating the public on child sexual abuse. I may shun any sex abuse educator who promotes corporal punishment of children, as most people with that type of trauma are quite likely to support the anti-spanking movement. 

The parent issue regarding punishment and control of children is a very religious issue to me, as I am aware of that trauma to the core. It is a myth that all of us are child abductors in waiting. I want the state to do it, and I want to see the cops slam a parent to the ground, with blood possibly flowing down the street. It was like trauma bonding, being spanked "out of love". My father DID apologize, and I'm glad he did - or else I would have had nothing to do with him, and he would have had literally nobody, and he'd deserve it. Parents serve a function in a child's life, and if they don't want to be good parents,. lock them up and collect the children, and have society make them ashamed to even exist as parents...Those parents are whom I'm angry at, Robbyn, not anyone who did those things and turned away from that sin...The anger is just water rolling, when spoken here. I AM DONE WITH PARENTS! You shall not exist, dear pro-spanking parents, but since you do exist, exist in prison, getting a good beating every day from your cell-mate, until you tire of it and go kill yourself. But, first, change the laws, so we can effect all this change that we want.

No, Robbyn, I am not angry with you. Please do not bring up that past domestic incident again, as I find the conversation a bit uncomfortable. You bring it up in a victimizing way that throws my senses off, because I know you are feigning a victimizing narcissist. Please don't pretend to be an abuser you are not. I do admit to my abusive tendencies, and I have no problem with you admitting to such as well, but say it as you mean it. 

Understanding my parental rights trauma

 Many people here seem not to understand my parental rights trauma. Some advocates here do have connections with the parent lobby, and I don't know how they can stand such cretins. A parental rights trauma is a bystander trauma, meaning which side do you choose. Which side do I empathize with in a power struggle? The child. Hands down. 

No parent should have rights over a child, period, without them being first earned by the child's trust. A parent is a servant of God, not a king or queen at the court bench. I hate all parents, meaning all in this country at least, because they are judge and jury over their children, and allow no advice otherwise from their children, keeping them down.

I hate and resent that children are overpowered by parents in this country. I feel like I am in place of the child, meaning the child represents my own trauma. I don't want that antimosity to even exist. I don't want to see conflict between parents and children. A "yes, dear" parent to every benign want is the best parent to have around, and I have one at home!

I am, by default, afraid of most every parent in this country from a distance, meaning in an angry, bring down way, but hold it back and presume innocence because parents are the property of the child, not me, thus I have no say unless upheared in by a child for help in dealing with their parents, and I would default to them defending to the greatest degree possible. Especially with pre-teens and teenagers, I can't be there to save them; they must save themselves. With young children, that would be different, as a 2-3 year old is basically a baby.

I hate the rights of parents, as they only have duties towards children, not rights over them like a dictator. I hate parents, period, when they identify by and defend entitlement or abuse against children, particularly pro-spanking parents.

I hate any control or manipulation in parenting, meaning any gaslighting whatsoever. You defend your parent status to my face, and I assume you mean the worst, and then press further. We all as adults failed children, so it would be no surprise that you would be an evil parent as to punish and reward a child like some lab mouse. Gentle parenting is about having parents as a best friend to talk to, and provide for you at the same time.

We don't want to give parents special rights or inherent rights, because they will misuse them, as they already do. I earn my rights around children, and don't identify by them, as that is prideful sin. I simply set an example in my work for all adults to follow in this country. If someone like me can do it, so can anybody.

What is "atheism" self-existence trauma

 Many people here in the children's rights movement have religious trauma. I might the only one here with irreligious trauma. I hate atheism,. though have to be tolerant to it due to my Christian beliefs on tolerance. Do not advertise that rag of filth or you shall be dead, or so I feel in the reverse.

Certain Christian academic topics are assumed ones, namely the resurrection and prophesies, all which point to the fact of a God. I also see a Bible well-organized, yet written over the course of centuries. Yes, there is a God out there, and that is objective fact. That is how I must see things in order to survive.

Atheism makes me think of an atom bomb, and the fact that I have an anxiety disorder. Nothing. Darkness. Who would be there to punish all the abusers of the world, or else reward their change of heart. Trying to remind myself of God's existence was like a searing trumpet, meaning "we don't know" as a statement is the most frightening spit of gaslighting that you can tell me, and is spiritually abusive to the core. 

In my case, I was attracted to my triggers, meaning "I must hear the other side", which I know is wrong.

Yes, I get it - atheists must do mental gymnastics sometimes to avoid Christianity. With me, it is like sitting on a stump, meaning the more I sit on the stump, the more I know it is beneath, meaning behind me. 

I'm glad I believe in God. It is not anything to struggle with, but a factual belief. This has nothing to do with any atheist here. Some people should not be atheists, because they put abusers' excuses in that bowl. It's a trauma that *I* am responsible for, and does not exist currently unless someone pushes atheism on me, in which case, by now, it is simply something that would get me very irritated. It is actually a benign spiritual trauma, and self-imposed partly. What didn't help was that my parents did not actually instruct me in a religion, and I had freedom to explore all faiths, and any one I chose they would support. I can't say that I'd be like that with my children, if I were to be a parent. My values are default, until they refuse instruction, then I would allow them to research different beliefs, hoping they'd come back, accepting the possibility that they never would, looking for faults in my parenting as to why they went to other beliefs. Children need religious structure, or else some objective moral structure, but they need it taught like the kindest, most caring teacher you had at school, meaning the one that might sit down with you if you had difficulties with learning or behavior. The instruction has a certain element to it that the child can question my interpretations and possibly change my mind - pro-social debate. I'd want my child to question everything, but at the same time earn their trust that their dad knows something about life.

Nobody on my friends list is spiritually abusing me

 Rev. Crystal Lutton and Samuel Martin are my friends, meaning they read my posts. We don't talk much though, otherwise. 

It has been tested that my Christian beliefs are not abusive. I took Nadine Block's autism abuser test, and if I had abusive beliefs, I would have died. My beliefs are not an issue for me. 

I am an ex-atheist, and I have a problem with me being an atheist. "Atheism" self-existence trauma is fear of going back to being an atheist, because I filled my cup with toxic, abusive leftist beliefs. God rescued me from atheism, and thus empowered me to spare every child that crossed my path.

Attn: Facebook - I deleted the rules

 Yes, *I* deleted them, because I had no means to explain why my page needs rules, by my standard. I see my page as an online community, and an online community needs rules. The rules were for the inside of the page, meaning page members and frequent patrons, so that they knew what to expect in terms of the prospect of being banned.

I have special traumatic needs, which I can only have accommodated on my page - I'm on my own when on other pages. I do ban the word "parent" on my pages, meaning if you defend yourself as one, you will be interrogated as guilty of something, until I can prove nothing through "guilt" framing, meaning repeated questions getting at the motive for your parent disclosure, presuming the worst intentions in a parent, while hoping for the best. An entitled disclosure would be "I am" next to "parent" in rights format, meaning not stating protective duties as a mere right - parents SHOULD protect their children from predators, and there is no room for mere rights there.

I can't make the whole community a parent-free zone, but I can make my spaces free of parents. I just have a lot of viewers who raise children and are caregivers, and the type never to punish or control. We support THAT kind of parent here entirely, but don't want the whiny, bragging types that come to troll occasionally. Some parents here might be lost, and simply use authoritative parenting with systematic punishments and rewards, in which case they don't belong here. It's not proper, and it's not right, and we need to get such parents over to the parent side until they agree with us, if they defy evidence that such parenting is immoral and harmful.

I just want control over speech on MY page. I am a conservative, and a libertarian one in many ways, meaning I don't care what you write on your page, and I'm not really picky about gentle parenting applications as well, as long as they don't control or cause damages to the child, with damages being the definition of abuse perceived by the child. Once you start trying to manipulate and demand, you cross into parenting heresy with me and I cannot be your friend anymore while you defend such abuse. 

Password changed for Facebook

The password is now ArfArf2017, meaning maybe I don't have a phone, meaning I don't snitch against myself.

Facebook can find out easily how much I'm lying the truth in terms of righteous truthtelling. 

Actually, I did not change anything, and if you can believe this, Dets. Greensbruck and Lefkowitz, this is true, because I am a good, honest man, and never lie.

To all survivors in this community

 There are 4 days to the culmination of the investigation. Please don't hurt me. I was abused by a "worry" narcissist. A survivor is a reformatory version of this abuser in many cases in this community. We know you are capable of overpowering a child, so why not me as well, even though I am an adult.

I doubt all survivors or even a search party of survivors will come to haunt me, as I haven't caused that much trouble. However, I have a near universal "parent" trauma, meaning if you reparent me in a controlling, authoritative way, based on punishment and reward, you'll get resistance.

Please leave me alone on these last days of the investigation, and I'll return the favor until the moment you set foot on my platform. If something upsets you, I'll try to be nice (which I can in writing) but when you are simply trying to censor my work, instead of simply leave alone what you find threatening.

"We aren't going to do that" I'll believe you, with caution, like you didn't believe me in the tape, like I wanted to believe when messing with the tape that I wasn't going to hurt anyone. We presume innocence, here at pedophile traumatics, all in one, because we don't want to EVER believe our abuser is after us. Gentle parents, you STILL are my abuser, but in reformatory format. You still have parent privilege over children. My trauma is a bystander trauma, because you could hurt me as well when you lose your cool...But, again, we want to believe you mean well. Note I ask questions? Tell me why you really arrive in gaslighting...because that's the only way there will be any exchange.

I hate control, meaning the gaslighting type, so I avoid it in my exchanges with controlling individuals here who call themselves "survivors" in a defamatory way. I prefer collaboration and working together to solve problems...You knew me before, Robbyn, then forgot who I was by listening to a child predator swindle you. They sure talk fast at anti-children's rights.

I make a post like this because a bunch of people have claimed their trauma in relation to me, assuming I'd attack them while consciously being able to know that I have no resources to find them in the way I was "prophesied" to attack. So, I made my own in relation to others. Sometimes, people with certain types of trauma worry in a coercive way that either the child may hurt them, or that they might get hurt by the child. I don't have to be grateful for "help" that is unsolicited under my Christian beliefs, meaning that which is painful or hurtful, even to the level of nuisance towards the victim.

I have the power and influence to not abuse your child, and I am proud of my choice not to as a pedophile. A good pedophile abstains, and restrains their sexually entitled tendencies. If that is your worry, know that if I did seek out your child, it would be for trying to be a non-entitled adult friend, meaning responsible friend, of your child. That is, if their interest in me is genuine, meaning not sexually motivated. I like empowered girls, and the fantasy for them to empower and reassure me when I'm down, so I reverse the roles due to my Christian parenting views requiring me to be the servant and attendant to the child, which would mean allowing children to drag me around their life, instead of the reverse. I need to be up to it, as by the end of the day in such cases, I'm tired and sleep good the night after...I am NOT to use a child's company for personal gain, by default, unless it imposes no damages on the child, and parentification can drain the child of energy, and maybe be a nuisance to her if I am too clingy.