What is a parent, when identified from above or by a frightened child? An abuser. Otherwise, they shouldn't be known. All parents around me, as a survivor of lawful abuse as a child, mean well, and don't stand out. An antisocial parent is a parent that does not work against its sin nature. A pedophile is a sexually entitled parent, meaning an antisocial parent conflated with sexual aggression. A pedophile is the easiest to treat and reform, if they are willing. Otherwise, it is the same sort of entitlement that all parents defend by nature, and a few (many who are clinically a pedophile) struggle...Put the parents in their place. Put up a staircase, and allow them to climb up, with you and their child standing in affinity, hand-in-hand, uphearing her parents like righteous servants. Pro-social send away, pro-social consignment, pro-social shunning. Parent be gone. Many warnings, then ban, the forgiveness (automatic response to genuine apology, including non-verbal egress from abusive habits). I live by the children's rights code, meaning the same code as any ordinary conservative Christian. Entitlement lead to theft, meaning theft is abuse, meaning abuse is fear inflicted, meaning I am capable of child abuse, and so are YOU as an parent/adult.
It says in John 7:24 KJV:
Judge not according to the appearance, but instead judge righteous judgment.
The Greek root word translated "judge" and "judgment" is κρινο (Latin: krino) and refers to the type of courtroom judgment that was customary in ancient Israelite society, under the Mosaic Law. This refers to a system of many warnings, meaning, for Christians, that one forgives their enemy by turning the other cheek by letting the infraction go, and issuing many warnings, until you can take no more, and then issue a ban and shun the parent. Ultimate, this refers to the presumption of innocence beyond a reasonable doubt in parents, with the word "appearance" (GRK: ὂψις, opsis).
I judge parents in terms of a ramp going downwards, once accused by a child or flagged as a parent by their speech about their child or glorified title. In order to convince me that the charges against you by a child, you have to climb up the ramp, and show me the evidence, and nothing but the evidence. In return, I'll show you the favor of caring about the evidence, and nothing but the evidence, believing at first that you are guilty of abusing a child, and ascribing that outcome onto you before hearing your side of the story. If you present your case the right way, meaning showing empathy to my concerns, meaning the child's, the charges will be dropped immediately. I am scared like the child is scared, and when a child is afraid of you, I presume you guilty, and there is no defense you can give to me except the incomplete "I am struggling". Most of the time, when parents defend their innocence, I notice their guilt and entitlement, and send them down.
In the case of suspecting an abusive parent from a bystander standpoint, you surround their house from the outside, in a covert spy, presuming innocence, while gathering information, bit by bit, to convict the parent, or possibly notify Berks County Children and Youth Services in order to do so. It is a jaded line that the parent can stop at any time by putting a stophand out in terms of evidence, meaning indicating that nothing really happened.
An exchange with a parent is intended to put them in their lowly place. The parent thinks that it is always right and it's child always wrong. The initial phase of testing a parent is questioning, meaning interrogating the parent with repeated, heated clarification questions, with the presumption of innocence beyond a reasonable doubt, with superficial suspicion ("I know what you are up to, even if I don't see it"), and until you answer my questions satisfactorily, meaning empathize with my concerns in a way that shows you to be not guilty, you are suspected of being guilty. I either ask open-ended questions, but in an aggressive way, or ask projectory/accusatory questions that feign projection and accusation to get parents to defend themselves. Any parent who was innocent of wrongdoing would either disprove the lie, or defend themselves in a way that is disproving (ex. prompting me to change the non-existent accusation). The goal is to remove all doubt as to that they are guilty, escalating as they show their true colors in terms of entitlement. The way I question, someone who was truly innocent would clearly be able to clarify the first or second time, in most cases, unless there is a communication barrier due to a gaslighting spell.
Once a parent pleads guilty, they are cast away, in the form of pro-social sequester. Stay over there, and I won't bother you, so you have nothing to complain about when you bother me. Some use this tactic against us, and they are simply not keeping their promise. True pro-social sequester involves no pro-social rape, or intrusion on our (meaning not conservative) way of life. The problem here would be religious abuse of the "help" variety, where I would just shun you by way of Facebook's block system, and then the ball is in my court, in which case I have to stop trying to contact my abuser - if I don't, I become the abuser and the flips scripts. The abuse I am talking about is antisocial "religious help", meaning coming to the victim with the intent to "help" them with "religious trauma" that doesn't exist. If I go to provoke such behavior, now that I am an adult, I am the abuser even if they are as well. I accept the ban from ETC, because I WAS spiritually abusive due to not explaining my intent. Now I have, so anyone that writes to me is guilty of religious entitlement leading to abuse under Divine Codified Law, and if you don't like those values, I can't make you believe in them. I can't make anyone believe anything, and "make" is a word that does not exist in my religious dictionary, especially with children (I don't even feel that way - they make me do things, even if they don't)...I think another form of abuse is involved - antisocial "coloring". I am angry at those who blaspheme the Lord's name through abusing children by way of punishing, controlling, or mollycoddling their children. I'm actually guilty of the third one, and I will tell you that gentle parenting actually DOES work for every parent/adult. It is wanting things from children in a pushy, appeasing way; the idea is take the attitude that I am entitled to nothing from a child, including the child liking me or being my friend.
