Parenting your pedophilic child: Why to accept your pedophilic child

Most parents fear their child being sexually abused by a pedophile. This is a valid and real concern for parents. However, few parents ever factor in the chance of their child developing pedophilia as a mental illness. However, the fact of the matter is that children can be diagnosed with pedophilia by age 16, and can be identified earlier in retrospect.

It is a myth that pedophiles are the ones sexually abusing children, with every single adult posing some risk of sexually abusing a child. However, pedophiles are the last of all adults to sexually abused a child. It is a myth that a pedophile is an anger packet directed towards a child. A pedophile is a person who has a primary or exclusive sexual preference for children under age 14. A pedophile is someone with autism who has child smarts, with these "child smarts" being reflected in the age-oriented sexual preferences of the pedophile.

The idea behind proper pedophile treatment is knowing that the word "pedophile" is not a medical excuse for abuse of any kind. The reason not to use that word is because that word is taken - by individuals who sexually prefer children. "Pedophile" is a celebratory term, meaning should not be an abuser's label. 

What should parents do when they see signs of pedophilia in a child? The first step is to hold space for your child to disclose their pedophilia. Once they do, listen and validate, like listening to someone's heart beat. Anyone familiar with listening to trauma will recognize this advice immediately. Compassionate empathy is what pedophiles need from their parents. 

Pedophilia is simply a sexual curiosity about children. This means that children need to learn about the child's body. There are certain body books that inform children about proper body parts and what to call them. I myself found out what a nude child looked like at a search party that was extended to me (this platform is under investigation). I myself am guilty of sexual harassment motivated by sexual curiosity about children, meaning I just wanted to see things.

Most pedophiles have a history of being sexually shamed by parents. This makes parent trauma being the collective trauma of all pedophiles. I filter the parents by the entitlement in their tone of voice. Most pedophiles are atheist, and blame all Christians for their abuse. Atheism is something that comes from a form of parent trauma coming from parental abuse. My abusive childhood is steeped in pro-parent indoctrination from pro-parent parents who identified to me in a court of law. The idea behind improving your pedophilic child's outcomes is to be there for them. That was the main thing my parents did right, amongst other memories that were either warm or cold in nature. My parents were simply worried sick about me, and even questioned their own parenting in a way that I like. I am now an ex-atheist, because that was my condition when being abused within the law - I need to know God is there to exact vengeance on my parent abuser.

The Greek root word denoting lust in the Bible is έπιθυμέω (Latin: epithumeo) and refers not to ordinary sexual desire, but instead refers to sexual entitlement. Sexual entitlement refers to, officially speaking, sexual want, to the point of sexually motivated approach. It is okay to look the look, and even think the think about a child, but there is a big difference between thinking the think and doing the deed. These were the values that my abusive liberal parents instilled in me, meaning they tried to stop me from approaching a children that I targeted, out of worry and not prejudice. The worst I got from my parents on that issue was denial that I had a mental illness called pedophilia.

Pedophilia is a valid mental health disorder, meaning not an abuser's label. Most child rapists are not pedophiles, but instead are opportunistic offenders, with any old adult being at some risk for sexually abusing a child. Most adults ignore that side of them, and this is how sexual abuse starts - with the repressed sexual desires coming out sideways, like a ton of bricks. Pedophiles experience things on the surface, and know where child sexual abuse starts - like the back of their hand. I myself can look into a house, and see where I might be alone with a child, and avoid such temptation like a bat out of Hell. I even tar and char my advances towards children with images of Hell. Most pedophiles come to these conclusions on their own, whereas I needed to be taught. Pedophile self-acceptance is not about self-love, but instead is acknowledging a personal flaw. It technically is a sexual orientation, but a flawed one nonetheless, making it a mental disorder.

I myself am a flawed pedophilic adult, and am deserving of absolutely nothing. However,  I can defend a fellow pedophile as I would myself, and most pedophiles do not have the sin count that I have. Many of them have a squeaky clean reputation unheard of in most adults. I sure do like myself, fantasies and all, even while without insisting that others like them or me. I just don't insist on good appearances, and don't think of myself as being a good person. I instead know that I am a flawed person. I am non-deserving of appearances, and deserve absolutely nothing in relation to children. I just am allowed fantasies, and also marvel at how far I have come in terms of pedophile progress. When answering what I like most about myself, I would say that my child fantasies are what I lean on in order to cope. I simply needed to avoid children, not out of self-hatred, but instead to protect children from my sexual impulses, as I did not know the boundaries until I took a leave of absence in order to purge it all. My mother must worry sick about me even today, just as she was then. I myself have a history of bipolar mania, and I needed some religion in order to ground myself - and grounded is all that will ever come of it. I myself have a sin count a mile long in relation to children. Most pedophiles simply have desires to accept. I myself have a sin count that I need to put to rest. Don't we all as adults have an entitlement problem in relation to children, in some way, in some form? I sure have that sense of entitlement centered at the penile ductile level, where it will stay until my dying day. My main entitlement problem was sexual want directed towards a child, in the form of flaming desire for romantic closeness to children, with romantic passions being a moral crime under my Christian faith. I myself am now under investigation for a rape, when all that happened was sexual harassment. I actually did the deed by way of antisocial "rough-play". She only told because she was told to by her parents, and everyone assumed she meant "rape" when she is a good friend of mine, and will always have a special bond with her. She told the truth, but lies came because of it, with the police acting on a previous false report from the anti-children's rights syndicate. I myself stand by my cousin, as all this scrutiny must be exacting a toll on her. I omit her name for her own privacy's sake. I am looking forward to cooperating with the investigation as it continues, and open my life to the public. I cooperate with the police as per my Christian faith, with me subjecting myself to the law of the land as I would any authority.

The depraved and entitled parents who sexually shame their pedophilic children will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into torrents of Hell-fire prepared for Satan and his accomplicesl! Repent!

Righteous co-sleeping: Why God wants parents to sleep next to their children

Many parents think that co-sleeping is the irresponsible choice on the part of parents. This is a common attitude on the part of parents. However, the fact of the matter is that not only is co-sleeping the responsible sleeping arrangement, but it also helps prevent child sexual abuse. 

Righteous co-sleeping is a part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission, with the burden of proof falling squarely onto parents. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers here to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of children. This highlighted word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parents and children in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to serve their children selflessly, just as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return. See also Matt. 22:35-40, 25:31-46.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers here to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and was understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. The parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing their children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment in his secular writings. Paull may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon.

It is common knowledge that children under age 6 oftentimes refuse to go to bed. Bedtime refusal is a common reason for parents punishing their children. However, the fact of the matter is that children under age 6 are not ready to sleep on their own. Children under age 6 had a primal fear of being devoured by predators. You might argue that no predators exist today. You would be wrong. Most child sexual abuse happens in the form of a bedtime ritual, with fathers usually sneaking into the child's room and, from there, rapes the child. However, this form of abuse usually could not happen in the Early Church, as the mother was right there, perhaps using herself as a human shield against the sexual wrath of fathers. 

The main reason for parents refusing to sleep next to their children comes from fearmongering on the part of pediatricians and mental health professionals serving children, with terms such as "sleep dependence". However, the fact of the matter is that co-sleeping, in the Early Church, happened every night in skin-on-skin warmth, with this co-sleeping usually ending at the onset of puberty, which is when most children wanted their own place to sleep. However, even in the case of extended co-sleeping, there always is an end to co-sleeping. Extended co-sleeping is a sign of autism, bipolar disorder, and/or ADHD. I myself have autism, and didn't sleep on my own until age 16, which was a means of asserting my independence.

Co-sleeping is the perfect way to gel a bond between parent and child. Co-sleeping in biblical times happened in skin-on-skin format, with the family bed happening in the nude every night. The father put his robe on a hanger. Mothers also put her loose-fitting, revealing dress that resembled an apron on a hanger. Children were closely guarded by mothers, with her acting as a stand-between between the child and their father. This stand-between setup helped mothers bond securely with their .

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

"Benign" deprivation: Why children need everything that they need

Many parents buy into their "right" of parents to use "benign" deprivation in order to choose what needs they feel like heeling to. However, proper Christian parenting involves meeting a child's every vulnerable need, meaning ALL needs, not just those that parents "feel like" meeting. 

The concept of "benign" deprivation is a violation of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV: 

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers here to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of children. This highlighted word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to serve their children selflessly, just as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return. See also Matt. 22:35-40, 25:31-46.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and was understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. The parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon.

"Benign" deprivation is an aspect of punitive parenting where parents ignore some of a child's needs to focus on what the child "really" needs. However, children growing up in the Early Church had their EVERY need met. Whenever the child cried, mothers cooed at children before picking them up, and from there, she diagnosed the need before meeting that need. Maybe the child was tired. Maybe the child was hungry. Maybe the child needed mom's milk. Maybe the child needed mom, period. Whatever children needed from mom, they got it.

A common way that parents deprive their children of needs is saying "no" all of the time. However, customary law in biblical times, by default, prohibited the word "no" being used on children. However, the exception to this general rule was when children asked for things that were unsafe, unworkable, and/or immoral. Even then, parents were required to give reassurance and an explanation. Parents then usually cushioned the punch by using nicer sounding words such as "that won't work" or "that can't happen". 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand.

Mutual respect: Why parents need to earn their respect from children

Many parents feel entitled to respect from children. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents feel deserving of respect from children. However, the fact of the matter is that respect for parents is earned, not handed out for free on a silver platter.

The doctrine of mutual respect is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission, with the burden of proof falling squarely onto parents. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers here to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This highlighted word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to selflessly serve their children, just as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return. See Matt. 22:35-40, 25:31-46.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers here to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and was understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children from punishment one last time. The parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon.

Respect for parents was a thing for children growing up in the Early Church. However, this respect came in the form of closeness to parents, as opposed to fear of parents. For the first 6 years of childhood, children were in constant closeness to mothers, meaning that wherever the mother went, so did her child. For the first 2 years of childhood, children were constantly held by mothers, either in her loving arms, or else on mom's back in a papoose bag when her hands were full. Between ages 2-6, children ranged next to mothers, following her from room to room, not leavimg mom out of their line of sight, morbidly fearing that mom would "go away and never come back". Whenever a child cried, mom cooed at children before picking them up, and from there, she diagnosed the need before meeting that need. Maybe the child was tired. Maybe the child was hungry. Maybe the child needed mom's milk. Maybe the child needed mom, period. Whatever children needed, they got it. When children under age 6 were out and about with mothers, mom wrapped up their child next to her bosom in swaddling blankets, with the swaddling blankets - and the child with them - were tucked underneath the loose-fitting, revealing dress worn by mothers that resembled an apron. Come nightfall, children co-slept next to mothers in skin-on-skin closeness and intimacy. Children growing up in the Early Church went naked wherever they went, with mothers also going naked in the confines of the family home. This birth nudity helped to facilitate easy skin-on-skin contact, with rays of skin-on-skin warmth happening even when the child was merely picked up. 

Children, in most cases, respected their parents as adults, by giving back to their parents in some way. I myself pay for the restaurant bill when out and about with my mother. However, parents had to earn the respect that they received by forming a secure attachment. All the Fifth Commandment means is to take care of your parents as they age, as a show of gratitude for all of the fond memories with parents. However, you can disown your parents whenever they are entitled or abusive in nature

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand.

Time-in: Why mammary closeness is the biblical way of doing time-in

Many parents these days rely on time-out as an alternative punishment to corporal punishment. This is a common setup in the American home. However, the Bible prohibits any form of punishments hor reprimands, including time-out. Instead, God wants parents to do time-in. There are many ways of doing time-in, with some parents even sending children to a "calming corner". However, there is a biblical way of doing time-in - mammary closeness.

Doing time-in is a part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission, with the burden of proof falling squarely on parents. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers here to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This highlighted word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parents and children in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to selflessly serve children just as they would God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return. See also Matt. 22:35-40, 25:31-46.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers here to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and was understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, bur not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. The parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of children in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon.

Time-in can be done in many ways, including things such as a "calming corner". However, in biblical times, there was only one way to do time-in - mammary closeness. Whenever children cried, mothers cooed before picking up the child, then holding the child next to her bosom in mammary closeness, perhaps co-snuggling with children in skin-on-skin closeness. From there, mom diagnosed the need before meeting that need. Maybe the child was tired. Maybe the child was hungry. Maybe the child needed mom's milk. Maybe the child needed mom, period. Whatever the child needed, they got it.

Breastfeeding and mammary closeness go hand in hand. Children who were milk-dependent remained so until the time came that the child refused to accept the teat of mothers. Children usually rejected the teat of mothers by age 2, but sometimes, children didn't unlatch until age 6 or even beyond. In biblical times, mothers breastfed children whenever she was called to, including in public.

Children under age 6, when out and about in public with mothers, were wrapped up next up to mom's bosom in swaddling blankets. The swaddling blankets were tied from the left breast, and then across the dot to the right leg, or vice versa, or both in the case of twins. From there, the swaddling blankets - and the child with them - were tucked underneath the loose-fitting, revealing dress thar resembled an apron. Whenever children cried, they were held even closer to mom's bosom, in mammary closeness. The swaddling blankets were made of velvet, which grew throughout the Ancient Middle East.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! \Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Righteous pampering: Why parents are to pamper and baby their children

Many parents think that children don't need to be pampered. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. However, in biblical times, children were pampered and babied. The fact of the matter is that the children need to be pampered and babied. God wants parents to pamper and baby their children. 

Righteous pampering is a part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission, with the burden of proof falling squarely onto parents. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers here to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This highlighted word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to serve children selflessly as they would God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return. See also Matt. 22:35-40, 25:31-45.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and here refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and was understood in its original context, as a morals statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. The parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon.

Righteous pampering in the Bible did not involve any old pampering. Instead, the Bible, when using the context as a guidepost, called for a certain specific form of pampering and babying children. For the first 6 years of childhood, children were in constant closeness to mothers, meaning wherever mom went, so did her child. For the first 2 years of childhood, children were constantly held by mothers, usually in her loving arms, but also on mom's back in a papoose bag when her hands were full. Between ages 2-6, children ranged next to mothers, following mom around from room to room, not letting mom out of their line of sight, morbidly fearing that mom would "go away and never come back". Whenever a child cried, mothers cooed before picking up the child, and from there, she diagnosed the need and then met that need. Maybe the child was tired. Maybe the child was hungry. Maybe the child needed mom's milk. Maybe the child needed mom, period. Whatever the child needed, they got it. When mothers and children under 6 were out in public, mom wrapped up their child next to her bosom in swaddling blankets, with the swaddling blankets - and the child with them - being tucked underneath the loose-fitting, revealing dress that resembled an apron. Come nightfall, children co-slept next to mothers in skin-on-skin format, with this co-sleeping setup happening every night, until the onset of puberty, which is when most children wanted their own place to sleep. Children went naked wherever they went, with mothers also going naked within the confines of the family home. This birth nudity setup helped facilitate easy skin-on-skin contact, with children getting rays of skin-on-skin closeness even when simply picked up.

After turning age 6, children played freely outside, naked. Older children in biblical times engaged in wet and messy play, with children exploring the terrain, and with children travelling farther and farther from home. However, children needed to check in with mom first, and tell her where they were going. Come evening, children were called - one by one - and were each given a warm, homecooked meal on a porcelain plate, after mothers cleaned up the mess on their children with a handrag. Come nightfall, children co-slept next to mothers, recharging for another day's play.

Children under age 6 were protected, in a sheltered way. Children under age 6 could not appreciate the dangers that existed outside, which included venomous snakes or scorpions. Today, the dangers that exist include busy traffic and would-be kidnappers. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! \Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Expanding child abuse definitions: Why the Bible calls for more laws protecting children

Many parents believe that the Bible has no answers on the issue of child abuse. This is a common belief amongst American parents. However, the ancients did have a concept of child abuse, with child abuse being determined by the perceptions of children.

The Greek root word denoting parental entitlement is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and is defined as, officially speaking, wanting things from children, to the point of imposition. Unofficially speaking, parental entitlement is when parents are sorely disappointed when they don't get what they feel that they deserve from children. Parents are deserving of absolutely nothing from children just for existing. Any parent anger directed towards a child was deemed parental entitlement then. Whenever this sense of entitlement was perceived by a child as offensive or damaging , it was deemed child abuse. See also Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers here to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and was understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. The parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing their children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon.

The Greek root word translated "they be discouraged" is αθυμέω (Latin: athumeo) and refers to children losing heart, meaning trauma. Whenever a child grew up to be atheist, parents were immediately charged with child abuse. Atheism then was seen then as evidence of child abuse, with there being no statute or limitations for parents to invoke before the council.

The Early Christians had a concept of child abuse. Child abuse was defined as under the Law as whatever the child perceived as abuse. When children self-reported\child abuse, the parents were brought before a council of 3 elders. If the parents were convicted of child abuse, the child was given a choice - parents or child saviors. Most child saviors were male pedophiles, but women could also be deacons, in which case they were usually female survivors of child abuse.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!