Children's Rights blotter: Weis in Oley, Pennsylvania

At around 6:00 to 7:00 PM EST, I noticed something very odd about how a child was treated in the Weis supermarket on Pennsylvania Route 662/73. A child wanted a gumball from a vending machine, and the parent refused in an entitled way, meaning a forceful way that imposed a personal want of hers onto her child victim, leading to offense by way of tears that the parent refused to reassure. The parent, by my gauge of wants, didn't want to buy the candy for the child because it would "cost too much money" and "it was too unhealthy". Clearly, most parents can afford to put a coin in a vending machine, and that does not take too much effort.

I shun the parent, without knowing her identity. God can identify the parent and bring her to justice. She'll die the second death, after dying the first one of natural causes. This post stays up as a signpost to document child abuse within my midst as a righteous judge. I hate the parent, meaning I hate her, meaning I hate her.

Child abuse, under Christian law, is wanting things from children, to the point of imposition, determined by offense perceived by the child (ex. tears, whining, protest). That want can include convenience, which was the modus operandi for this moral crime. See Col. 3:21 and Eph. 6:4. Basically, whatever the child perceives as child abuse objectively is.