Tuesday, June 21, 2022

"Joke" investigations: Why to change the abuser locator to "I am the adult..."

Many people are unaware of what a "joke" investigation is. There are levels of knowledge of how the police operate. Did you know that you can get investigated just for admitting that you are a pedophile, in the wrong place, at the wrong time?

Now, to be clear, I am NOT one of those civil libertarian types who think we should have lesser sentences for pedophiles. A pedophile is a victim/abuser, meaning they are far more likely to be victimized or taken advantage of than become an abuser. Most pedophiles abuse in their late teens-early 20s, and usually by loitering around child victims as a form of sexual harassment, and the abuse is usually everyday in nature - children experience worse abuse from their parents and other adults (ex. schoolteachers, coaches, etc.). Pedophiles are not the problem concerning child abuse. Adults are.

Parental entitlement is any time an adult wants something from a child, to the point of imposition, with this form of entitlement being denoted by the Greek root word πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés). Child abuse is when this entitlement is perceived by a child (see Col. 3:21, Eph. 6:4). The sin of covetousness is basically defensive entitlement. Entitlement can be struggled against, in which case it is forgivable. Usually, entitlement leading to child abuse comes with the excuse, at least some point during the interview, "I am the adult, and I have the right to do X to a child". Some adults identify as "parent" in place of "adult", but the epithet against children is the same.

I am a pedophilic adult, and I am guilty not because of any mental health diagnosis or self-diagnosis I might have, in which case pedophilia is a self-diagnosis of mine. I am guilty because I am an adult in relation to children, and am deserving of DEATH and PUNISHMENT merely for existing in relation to children, yet God allows me to exist, and children forgive me for the abuse that I have meted out to them. I might have earned my right to exist in relation to children, but I will let the good Lord decide that. I do consider myself one of the Saints who choose to fight against their parental entitlement instead of embrace it.

Whenever someone utters "I am the adult..." as a rights statement, or as a statement period, there should be an investigation done, because no safe adult says they are the adult, or takes that attitude. If they do have that attitude, they struggle against it. To defend that entitlement is abhorrent and reeks of an abuser. Usually, adults say that epithet to their child victims in order to justify their abuse, and any time you say that to your child, you are abusing them in some capacity. 

Adults should be presumed as non-existent until proven otherwise beyond a reasonable doubt, and then, they shouldn't be allowed to exist anywhere near children, period. Help the parents with a punishment habit by removing them from the burden that is their children and finding them a nice warm prison to relocate to. But, before that, we must go on any excuse that proves innocence and non-existence in an adult. Adults simply imply themselves as the adult before then, and once they name themselves, they tar their existence forever.

Just say that you are a pedophile instead. Nobody says that out in the open unless they are asking for help, or else just identifying by their sexual preferences. Admitting to a mental health diagnosis of any kind is better than admitting to being an adult, in order to defend yourself, as the assumption should be that nobody would diagnose themselves with a mental illness unless they were seeking help.

The entitled adults who provoke children to anger through child abuse will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them BURN in everlasting torrents of fire! Repent!

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Righteous co-sleeping: Why God wants parents to sleep next to their children

Many parents think that co-sleeping is the irresponsible choice for a parent to make. This is a common attitude from American parents. Most ...