Sunday, March 13, 2022

Why parents are tools to meet their child's needs

Many parents think that their children are subordinates, and that they can order children around like servants. The common Christian belief is that children "serve parents" and thus need to be "held to that duty". The fact of the matter is that parents are to be selfless, and tools to their child's every need.

Every single parent and adult is guilty in relation to children, and is deserving of DEATH and DESTRUCTION merely for existing in relation to children, with parents/adults being obligated to being meek and shamefaced in relation to children, and with parents being shut up in the Lord. Parents especially are to be convicted of their child's needs, putting children first, and parents last, to the point of dutiful and selfless submission to children and their every need, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting securely and safely in parents. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. Children should be allowed to tell parents anything and everything under the sun, including confessions of wrongful acts or marginalized status, expecting no punishment or reprisal in return. Children are to use their parents like tools or vehicles to achieve a means, with that means being their needs. Children naturally adore their parents, but in an objectified way, seeing parents as "thing one" and "thing two" that hands them everything they need. That's all a parent should be for a child - use them, as they are there for just for you as an individual child. Parents should present themselves as milking-objects differently for each of their children, as each child has individualized needs.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or abuse, including children. That means the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including the slightest of offensive touch or speech, coming from entitlement. The Apostle Paul here was lifting up the Law on punishing children. Any punishment or controlling measures against a child carried severe penalties under the Law, with the traditional punishment being death by bloodletting (hanging up parents like poultry). The seven rod verses in Proverbs are repealed verses, meaning they only apply to the context that they were given to. This is because they refer to a dated form of judicial corporal punishment, specific to the Old Testament and the death penalty contained therein - the 40 minus 1 lashes with the rod of correction, administered to ADULT children, as a last warning before being put to death, and only after a criminal conviction for a capital offense. Minor children could not legally be whipped, as they were deemed incompetent to stand trial for criminal acts or civil wrongs that they committed, due to youthful inexperience and immaturity. Only adults faced punishment under Jewish law. Under Christian law, no whipping or execution could ever take place, and Christians were even prohibited from taking part in executions or whippings under Roman law.

Parents in biblical times served different roles. Mothers served children as far as nourishment and sustenance, meaning breastmilk and skin-to-skin closeness, with co-sleeping lasting until adulthood, and breastfeeding lasting until age 3. Children were naked everywhere they went, and mothers were naked when in the house. Fathers were more equal in terms of how they related to their children, and most had active parent attraction due to this equality, meaning the equality uncorked sexual attraction to children of the connotational "sun tan oil" sort. Most fathers did not sexually abuse children, but simply put them on a pedestal, speaking of how much they loved their children (especially daughters) in baroque, flowery language, boasting about how they were proud of their children, allowing a bit of parent attraction to show in their language for accountability. Both parents were selfless, in a passive and convicted way, and children were expected to take advantage of parental hospitality.

Children in biblical times were very demanding, and even controlling with their parents to some degree. Children in Ancient Israel and the Early Church demanded things from their parents, objectifying them as trees that bore the fruit that was their every need. Sometimes, you need to shake that tree a little to get all the fruit in the basket. That's all parents were to Christian children, and that's all God intended parents to be for dependent children. Children would then grow up to adore and honor their parents for how they were so sensitively and gently cared for in childhood. 

Parents in biblical times presented themselves as a tool, meaning a selfless resource to go to for help, assistance, and counseling. Parents weren't supposed to be scary, but make you feel good with how helpful they were. And, you could tell them anything, and if you didn't want it known to others, parents would commit to not telling others about what you told them. You could scream commands to them, and use hand signals such as a stophand, and parents would do their best to appease your upset. Parents saw themselves as bondservants to their children, with children being in place of God.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them burn in the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Birth nudity: Why God wants birth nudity in the family home

Many parents believe that children deserve punishment when they cry. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American paren...