Why spanking your child is a violation of natural law in America

Many parents abuse children in this country, meaning most all at some level. 70% of parents support the right of a parent to physically punish a child as a form of abuse and control. However, most parents do not know that punishing your child in any way goes against the very natural law in which this country was founded.

This country was founded on three main principles. Life. Liberty. Property. With children not being the latter, but being eligible for the middle one. Children have the right to liberty as well. What is the opposite of liberty? Tyranny, meaning adult tyranny, which will be knocked down like building blocks, one by one, convicting the heart of an entitled adult and child abuser with the children's rights dogma, chastening them up in the Lord, striking reverent terror for their children and/or all children around them into them. Children have the right to liberty and property, but especially the first one. I support lowering the voting age to zero.

The teaching of mutual submission is the guiding teaching of parenting in this country, no longer how unpopular. It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in everything, as this is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to providing custody under the Law, meaning a child resting in the provisions of parents, feeling safe being whomever they are, being able to voice individual opinions and dissent against parents, even forcefully, owing nothing in relation to parents, but nonetheless showing gratitude for care and tact from parents by listening to the voice of parents and heeding instruction, meaning in terms of reassurance and familiarity of the voice of parents, not fear of punishment. 

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers here to parental entitlement by way of dereliction of duties, meaning here provocation of a child to anger, which referred to any parental behavior that leads to the slightest of offense in a child, with the parent or adult being entitled in nature. This can apply to mothers as well, and can be applied in any way and all ways in sync with the context, meaning all ways, including a ban on spanking, apply where applicable. As a children's rights advocate, I feel the calling to apply moral laws like this in any way feasible and possible, in as flexible as a way possible, as what allows me to charge the parents, given the evidence. Provocation to anger is a measurable offense, and specifically refers to the visible upset in the child's expression, and the flexibility refers to the parental action that earned that response, meaning if it was any entitled rejection, I must judge. I cannot usually make a report, but I know what kind of trash parent you are then, and know where you are headed...

The role of counseling psychologists is a parental role, under biblical terms, meaning the same transference techniques therapists use to form a rapport were used in ancient Hebrew/Christian culture to form a bond with children. Parents bonded with their children by way of attachment parenting, meaning listening to cries coupled with physical closeness with mothers, and distant closeness with fathers. This is the national parenting of America, as American values are gleaned from the Israelite context, transported to America by the advent of both Christ and the New Testament...Children, even ad adults, have a certain transference to attachment parents that may sound perverse - objects of comfort, or else prized servants that you'll never give away to anyone else. That is the basest perception of my mother, while humanizing her fully on the surface as my best friend. My mother is an attachment parent, with most of my abuse stemming from my father, who then disagreed with her and then ate his words later, then coming to the same parenting conclusions himself, hence why I don't blame him all the time, and stick to parents in general. I can't stop my anger, but I can fan it out. Pro-social fan, antisocial parents. Pro-social parents do exist, but they are rare, to the point of not naming them as such all the time, which they don't mind.

The depraved and entitled parents will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them burn in the lake of fire and brimstone, which is the second death entrapping Satan and his accomplices! Corporal punishment of children was never acceptable, even if it accepted widely! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!