Many people today are getting vaccinated for COVID-19, but some aren't. Vaccine rights means the right to decide for yourself whether you want to get vaccinated, based on your personal beliefs as to whether it would be effective, or whether it would be against your religious beliefs.
It says in Exodus 20:17 KJV:
Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor anything that is thy neighbour's.
The Greek root word translated "covet" is לחמוד (Latin: lachmod) and refers to wanting things from children, including any consent from them, to the point of seeking to impose said want onto children, leading to abuse stemming from offense taken. The Greek root word cross-referencing this commandment, and taking it further, is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to the entitled attitude of "I am the parent here, and I own my child's body" leading to wanting children to put something in their body without informed consent, leading to offense. It says in Colossians 3:21 KJV:
Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.
The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to the offenses, namely any bodily contact that the child perceives as offensive, namely when such a situation is created by entitlement over the child's body, not allowing them to make choices on their own about what chemicals to put into their child's body.
Most children, when they know the risks of not being vaccinated, want vaccines, and this can go the opposite route in an anti-vaccine home. Some children might have developed a phobia of needles. Sure, they should want to confront that fear, but maybe they aren't ready to do that yet, in which case exposure therapy would simply revictimize the child. In narrow instances like this, a religious exemption would be warranted for regular vaccinations mandated for school attendance.
It is not an attitude I'd encourage in a child, but one that I would merely tolerate, meaning not punish, as punishing a child for any rebellion is against my religious beliefs myself. The First Amendment has no age requirements for it to be binding in its original text, meaning children can hold whatever view they wish, and should be able to do so without adult interference...This article is simply a testament as to how important bodily autonomy rights are.
The depraved and entitled parents who control their child's body in an entitled manner will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them BURN in everlasting Hell-fire! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.