Right of asylum: Why pedophiles are welcome at children's rights (under certain perameters)

 Certain people, namely certain parent coaches who otherwise parent without punishment, do not understand our movement's policies on allowing pedophiles in. Among major social movements in our modern day that aren't pedophile-led, the children's rights movement is the most generous to pedophiles. We only hate the abusers. The movement has a long history of human rights abuse against pedophiles that now seems to be waning, with me perceiving no human rights violations from the movement - just some misunderstandings. 

Pedophiles are given right of asylum based on a common pedophile belief of two-way help. My personal beliefs allow for one-way consensual help, and the movement tries to accommodate that religious belief, with certain offenders, namely Robbyn Peters Bennett, being a small group of usual offenders when enforcing the human right to freedom of religion, thought, and conscience.

The dispute among those in this community is whether pedophile asylum is permanent. As permanent as "permanent" allows as a concept, meaning based on the behavior of the pedophile, meaning the pedophile must walk the line straight to the movement. We know a disclosure when we see one, and those that are clear yet show some level of remorse, meaning not bragging or threatening, prove themselves to be the ones we want here. They just have to prove themselves on a spreadsheet. And, that's only if they are under investigation. Otherwise, you actually can disclose in any group, and as long as it is a clinical disclosure, and not also celebratory, it will be allowed, and be seen as highly unfortunate by other survivors. They see it as a terrible fate

"Stay" means what it says it means - he/she stays. We have pedophiles here, and most cover it up for appearance's sake. I am the one here who is open about it, and I don't care. I can be the most hated man here in Reading, and I don't care, as long as my pro-social honesty saves just one child, by alerting the the court of the public eye and the civil authorities, any collateral damage to my reputation is worth it. I am being honest knowing the risks to my reputation, and not caring. Children's rights movements tend to want to hide your work, which simply gives me further security. I'm a small operation anyway, and may need others to carry my ideas, and vice versa. I am going to say whatever I want to endanger myself for a friend, and accept all outcomes. That doesn't literally all outcomes, if someone is abusing me, but be careful they are the one abusing. I am easily spooked by anything that resembles grooming - painting. Some here like to paint onto me and my life, and that I do resent. They know who they are, and I presume they are working on it.

I am here for asylum. "Asylum" means respite. Sometimes, that means legal persecution, which pedophiles might claim. In the United States, it is usually false. But, a pedophile can conflate their condition with any trauma, and be believed, as long as they disclose their pedophilic condition using trauma-informed language, in a way that is respectful to fellow survivors. A pedophile can be a survivor, but until I donned the label, it never happened...Nope, never going to lead this movement. That takes too much energy and responsibility, and I'm not that organized. I just have a "hidden shack" sort of advocacy. But, I hope it has flipped the scripts in terms of mental health stigma about pedophilia.