Tuesday, May 11, 2021

Why I am guilty just for being an adult

Many parents seem to shout out of nowhere "I'm a proud parent", and with this pride, comes defending the "right" to control and punish their children. The child abuse epidemic does not come from mere groups of people, but societal attitudes that keep children down. A deserving attitude is what it is, coming from these entitled parents...I am guilty just for existing in relation to a child. 

Every single adult, by default, has a depraved and entitled sin nature, deserving of DEATH and PUNISHMENT merely for existing in relation to a child, meaning in relation to God, meaning both together. Under the doctrine of Christian love, as denoted by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) parents are to lawfully, judicially, and selflessly submit to their children as their enemy, meaning adults no longer are capable of understanding what it is like to be a child, and that I am a member of a group of people - adults - that have abused and oppressed children since the beginning of time, usually with sexual abuse. In more modern centuries, with corporal punishment as a mainstay of abuse.

I am evil, depraved, and wicked as an adult, due to my depraved sin nature, meaning the capacity to harm a child. Adults, in this country, are vested with a sort of power and control over children that is overwhelming and god-like "authority" over children. I myself surrender my authority to the child's bench, testifying with my remorseful action in divine court as to my wickedness and worthlessness, making amends for one's adult sexual entitlement by way of avoidance. I am entitled to nothing from a child, and the child is entitled to everything from me. It says in Colossians 3:21 KJV:
Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to God's definition of child abuse under His Laws, which differs from the laws of men. It is the slightest of slights that a child perceives, namely though acts of control and punishment, but also any entitled action or choice of words by an parent or other similarly charged adult in relation to a child. In any moral crime, including against a child, there should be two components, guilty intent (mens rea) leading to guilty action (actus reus), with the guilty intent of the defendant being guided by the perceptions of the child, meaning if the child perceives something as offensive, the adult has to make amends by either apologizing to the child and/or explaining their intentions. Defending such an action as a "right" is the moral crime of entitlement leading to theft. 

I am responsible to children, meaning I owe them everything I am capable of giving to them, which isn't much admittedly, except personal space and avoidance. I am guilty in relation to them for merely for my existence, merely for being capable of abuse and harm towards them, having an entitled adult nature in relation to children. I am in Hell, and treating children with respect proves my way out, as children are extensions of God, and extended by our Lord for their needs to be met.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand! 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Child punishment: Why God hates any punishment of a child

Many parents think that they feel entitled to punishing a child. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents f...