Tuesday, April 6, 2021

Why children have the right to "talk back" to me - pro-social rebellion, pro-social defiance

 Many parents, including some of my gentle parenting colleagues and compatriots, still see "back talk" as a bad thing. Gentle parenting is often explained as a complex way to "get your child to listen" by listening to them, saying "sorry, but there is no easy answer". I myself do not want a child to comply with my instructions, as I do not want a child to be compliant with me.

It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to surrender coming from the surrender of parents to the child's every vulnerable need, knowing how evil and wicked they are, and how they will never understand their child, expecting absolutely nothing in return. It is a form of pro-social pedophilia. This is very different from the actual mental health disorder, and has nothing to do with any diagnosis of that in anyone. It has to do with mimicking how grooming from a predatory pedophile, namely the siphon part, siphons erratic and inappropriate behavior towards parents, or towards trusted adults. It is a common gentle parenting strategy for hyperactive children due to ADHD or bipolar disorders. 

The idea is for children, all of whom are energetic in some light, to let loose at home with mom and dad, or else also with trusted relatives and friends of the family. The idea would be that a child would be shy or afraid of an adult who meant harm. The idea is to get them to "talk back", and get them to know their right to disagree with me without being punished and controlled.

Children, when around me, tell me all. They don't feel any need to be quiet. Most adults want to change something in a child, whereas I don't. I want them there, within eyeshot, being who they are, without fear of punishment for it. They have a right to protest for a redress of grievances against my providing custody over them. Maybe I'm a lousy caregiver for whatever reason and they need to tell me and let me know.

Anything the child finds abusive, by their own perception, is abuse, under Divine Codified Ordinance, as it says in vs. 21, referring to legal damages such as pain, shame, emotional abuse, defamation of character, and fornication, all guided by parental entitlement, which all adults have in relation to children, and most defend.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger will not inherit the Kingdom of God! They will forever languish in the lake of fire and brimstone, which is the second death! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!


No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Time-in: Why mammary closeness is the biblical way of doing time-in

Many parents think that time-out is a safe alternative to corporal punishment of children. This is a common attitude amongst American parent...