Understanding parental control - and why it is entitled sin

 Many adults are child abusers. Plain and simple. 94% of adults physically batter and assault children, with a third of them using an implement such as a belt, spoon, or spatula. All adults have the ability to control a child, myself included, and so we wield it wisely, by wielding it never towards a child.

I myself have a different locus of control towards a child. This is diagnosed indirectly in my medical records as pedophilic disorder. It is a permissive, fixating drive directed towards the child, in the form of adult sexual entitlement. I am a situational narcissist, based on helping children in abusive situations similar to mine, but in a fatalistic way that doesn't prompt me to "advance" but to shut down and cower because I can't protect my child, meaning their child, meaning the parent's child that I can't stand getting hurt. I wanted to call the police, but the police would never believe me, meaning they'd laugh at me and tell me to respect the child's parents. So, I'd "escape" with "kid crushes", and the two mental states were linked at a level I wasn't aware of, but nonetheless interacted, meaning the stress levels I was under had direct subconscious influence into how I approached and treated children...I got help, and seeing developmentally-informed information here telling me that children are less capable of certain "good" behavior emotionally at younger ages, in a way that paints a 12-year-old girl into who she really is - just a kid, and not a little adult due to her physical development.

Most parental control in this country is slightly different than mine in terms of mode and output, and is less difficult to control due to the higher level of mode, meaning a physically aggressive parent is actually more likely to "give in" to physically aggressive tendencies towards children, as they are viscerally felt as an urge after becoming angered. In some physically abusive homes, sexual abuse occurs once or twice against a child growing up as a brick that "comes out" (the abuser's excuse) when the abuser chooses to be in a reckless location, as a form of adult sexual entitlement. 

Parental entitlement is control of a child, meaning the seeking out of such as motivated by parental instincts. All parents, by default, are antisocial in nature, due to the wicked and depraved nature of adults, but a few are pro-social due to their choice not to punish or otherwise control their child. Most pedophiles are pro-social parents, by my observation and polling, by opposing spanking, saying a lot about them in terms of the levels system. A pedophile generally hates spanking at the core level, many times getting to a point of vanish, where they are so afraid of it that they tune it out. Most physically aggressive parents, however, still abuse their children physically ("physically aggressive" simply refers to capacity, not guilt of abuse - there's some overlap). This is due to the permissive attitudes towards physical violence in this country as a whole. Most child abuse in this country, in terms of grid, is linked to physical abuse, not pedophiles. Pedophiles, from a child protection standpoint, are simply a small remote community on the fringes of society, that mimick an abuser but really aren't the abuser at all. The most plagiarized identity, next to the most defaced - society calls people pedophiles without them being such, and on another hand defaces the identity of children by using it as a youth slur. Neither the word "child" nor "pedophile" are bad words. Both delineate a victim, and both can occur in the same person.

Parental entitlement is a sin against God, and is denoted by the Greek root word πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektes) and refers to wanting things from a child to the point of seeking to impose said wants upon a child's person, property, or effects, leading to theft/abuse. The terms "theft" and "abuse" refer to damages, which can be any emotional or physical wrongs perceived by the child, gauging the intent of the parent perpetrator. If you are willing to reconcile by way of reassurance, as an apology, there is no abuse to setting limits.