It seems Robbyn Peters Bennett, a central advocate for the rights of children, might be on her way out unless she apologizes for an attempted rape. It was a sloppy one, involving attempting to break into a middle/high school where my mother works in Kenhorst, threatening to fist my mother in a way that would kill her, given she has osteo-arthritis and thus suffers cramps from time to time.
She claimed to be "protecting" me from future abuse from my mother, seeing me as a child, with her taking attitudes of factitious disorder on me. I don't ask for that kind of protection, and ask that she keep distance from my mother and myself. My mother might just be the barrier in between me and a young girl...She's much like you are on the issue, but just a bit more tired in dismissing it ("yeah, yeah, but it's never going to happen"). She does not celebrate my condition, but neither does she demonize me for it. She informs me of the consequences of acting on it. Yes, that includes, in such a home, learning about a child's body parts and development, so you know how small and fragile they are.
I'd recommend she, at this point, reflect on her actions, and if she is not willing to, she may have to be temporarily removed from the community, something I don't want. All I want is for her harassment to stop. She indicated beforehand that she was sorry by not caring about fantasy, and vanishing it out - the exact way to deal with the issue. Now she is sliding backwards in her grieving. I want her simply to grieve, because there will be light at the end of the tunnel, because I am the master of my choices, and can simply not attack her on her spaces.
Yes, I did Google her. I am a victim vigilante, meaning I publish phone numbers on occasion so people can make their voice heard. That would have to be due to serious abuse, meaning severe and repeated stalking, meaning with intent to move around or terrorize like an object - antisocial "God" - or repeated harassment that has been documented and forewarned as such. Many people will say hurtful things in life, and most of them aren't grooming or stalking me. I tend to react when you have that intent towards the wrong person. In vigilante school, we called it "barking up the wrong tree". Note I defend myself as a victim would. That just means I'm a victim and not a perpetrator. An abuser would go on a crusade - picture holding a torch and demanding their rights. "I have the right" stated and demonstrated in the tirade. Victimizing narcissists live their whole life by that phrase. Instead, I selflessly defend myself, perhaps by vocally not caring about abuser epithets as non-listening, and possibly incriminate myself with feigned callousness, catering to the prejudice of the abuser. Most people here would kindly ask "please don't put this on my page" in which case I take that as non-threatening. When you come in and ambush in airborne form in a manipulative way, that is a form of abuse, especially if you use the acronym pro-social molestation to justify it. Come to me calmly about concerns, and expect a calm response. I don't see myself on top of a cliff, but on the bottom of a cliff, in a pro-social way - children. Meaning, I see women as simply the other half of the adult plane, but we are still responsible as adults. I don't like surprises, but have been getting better at such.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.