Reform from within. Reform with-out. We hate every single parent here at children's rights, here at anti-parental entitlement. We decimate them and annihilate them to ashes, being the pro-social terrorists that we are, saving every child and plundering every parent by flipping the switch, and sending sound waves into the future. We hate every inch of your being, you spoogs and specks, you pro-spanking cretins and idiot. 40 lashes...that draw blood!
We are children's rights aligned, but are not of this world, instead being of the next, particularly on the children's rights issue. We are the saints chosen by God to further the best interests and rights of children, terrorize every parent who shows themselves above the weeds, chopping them down like tall poppies. Not even their pastor will give his blessing to their lawful abuse of their children, because a pedophile stopped his abuser. Reform from within means turning the Christian Church inside-out, and forcing them to succumb to the factual evidence, which is already happening, ever so slowly, with fundamentalist churches now dropping their spanking mandates. This is creep-up change.
The church is what fuels how things go in this country. There are valid anti-spanking Christian arguments for sure, and the more you focus on the context, the more you realize that the Bible is a gentle parenting document, given how children were raised during biblical times - in an attachment-based way. The idea is that once His Church is on board, the whole country is on board. The idea is for perspective and information from my blog to go up the train of information to lawmakers, alongside a whole array of evidence on behalf of children.
I may be seen as a preacher type, but I can be critical of the church, many times. I actually support the church more than most people do here, but like any worldly institution, it is flawed, especially on child abuse issues. I am not a loud person about these topics in real life, like I am on my own spaces, on the Internet. I am very quiet, in a peaceable way, and am a man of few words. Or, I can speak in a quiet voice, or a loud booming voice, depending on my mood. Preachy? Nope...I put on a show for the abusers, based on a real part of me, and a deep part of me, known as lawful trauma.
"Pedophile" is a word that is synonymous for "survivor" coming from me, and denotes the fact that pedophilia is a parental lobe in the brain that is motivated by sexual aggression, and being honest as such, either as a educational self-diagnosis or upon questioning, shows you have nothing to hide or show in terms of child abuse, by default. Most sexual abuser will argue by another label, namely "parent".
Pedophiles, by my projections, are likely going to be the one of the first major parenting groups to give up spanking entirely, even at the habit level, and the idea is to promote our parenting to more pedophiles, who may need it in order to refrain from their sexually entitled tendencies. Once we surrender our false policing authority over children, the more, hopefully, other parents will be driven to not abuse their children, because "if a pedophile can do it, so can I", but since society projects an abuser onto pedophiles, instead of taking responsibility ourselves, nothing will get done.
Pedophilic adults are admitting to their sexually entitled traits, and are centering them. Many people know this, but quietly so due to political correctness from political conservatives. As this knowledge and awareness creeps-up, the more we will be able to ban spanking. If one understands what egalitarian, gentle parenting does to the brain of a parent, one will understand why banning spanking will happen someday. Gentle parenting, when internalized at the lowest/highest level, is the type of relationship a pedophile would want from a child, except for the fact that it gives me non-entitlement restrictions that filter over to other parts of my life...Things are changing, and thankfully for the better, for both children and pedophiles. My page is just one small, humble part of that change, but a proud one nonetheless.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.