To: Robbyn Peters Bennett, Janine Geisler

 We know you are a hacker, Robbyn. You are allowed to just hack in and change the code. You have my consent. I do not know the code, as I am computer dumb to that degree. I can't even hack an arcade machine, and I've tried, many times.

If you can believe your help would be appreciated, that would be the fact. Why? Because I asked, thus the help was consensual under my Christian beliefs. You are not close enough to me to assume what I need. Thank you in advance for helping me out, because this time, it is consensual...You seem the type of person to assume a lot about others with the best of intentions. Know that sometimes meaning well can get you into trouble if the other person doesn't want it. I think you were trying to teach me that, based on opposite gaslighting - meaning everything in my medical and school records is the opposite - which is the worst way to defame a child in the course of grooming. Nobody knows who you are as a child, and assumes the opposite about you. Of course nobody would believe what the child has to say about themselves.

Everything monstrous you were told of me can be attributed to opposite gaslighting. "The real Max hides everything" means the exact opposite, by the way. Grooming statements come in "everything" or "nothing" honorifics, making the child a legend. Usually, it is a private belief of a child predator that is conflated with adult sexual entitlement, either a fixation or desire to control a "behavior problem".

I myself don't even groom that way as a pedophile. Zig-zag, meaning meet the child first, then meet the parents, replicating a grade school crush. Parents have plenty of tools to stop the advances. The goal ultimately is to get as close to the child as possible in terms of "company". This may not even include talking, but just being there next to her, meaning it can be channeled into an age-appropriate yet age-disproportionate friendship, due to the distant nature of the friendship...With Kaylee, I actually got permission from her mother, in airborne voice, to hyphenate her name for her privacy. I was told she has a lot of enemies on the dark web, and former friends of mine have attacked her for reasons I feel responsible for (even though it was his own fault), so I didn't want to give her any harmful attention. My first instinct is to hide a child's identity on my page, meaning usually do not talk about them on screen or invoke their name, as they have a good name that cannot be defamed without malicious intent. Any use of their name that would be degrading, humiliating, or otherwise offensive, would be misuse of her name, or else any use that might be backtracked to the child for them to be harmed. I just don't want some thug on the dark web to be triggered, even though consciously I know it is solely their fault, because of "footprint" type attitudes. I'm afraid he'll do it again, and that'll hurt me as well. Well, it scared me...Yes, I do want to be friends with her, viscerally speaking, but only once I gauge my ACTUAL intentions, meaning eliminating ALL evil, meaning sexually entitled intent, before being her friend. Any spousification, or projecting a spouse or lover onto a child, is adult sexual entitlement, by the textbook definition, and is something to flee from. I might end up being romantic, or try to be, which isn't appropriate even as a drive to follow.

Yes, I dreamed about Kaylee, and I can't remember much of it. It was a very warm, inviting feeling, like hospitality, only I didn't push anyone away. My memory is vague, as I usually don't remember my dreams at all. This one was a righteous test from the gaslighting...My mom was part of it as well. Only, I'm an adult, so much of that, to say the least, unrealistic. The actual dream does not make sense, but the feelings behind it definitely do. Only, I should be providing HER hospitality, as an attachment need, because I am an adult and thus responsible for a child, if not only her emotional needs and safety. I have an idea as to how old she is, but if she'd under the age of 18, she's still a child to me. "Child" is a word that indicates a victim by default...If I did visit, I might have to take up the responsibility of providing for her. I am a parentifying pedophile, meaning I see children as parents, which is a tendency I keep in terms of lawful orders as to needs, but I can second the order and overrule it if it is harmful or inappropriate. No plans to visit, at all, as I would prefer to meet in a neutral location, perhaps in a way that isn't entirely planned out on my end of things. I don't think being invited to her home is the best bet in terms of safety.