I apologize for all the defenses on this blog, even though I don't have to. I don't like having a blog full of moral legal defenses against abuse and entitlement. It's like clutter all around. I, in real life, am simply not the most proud person around, meaning around children especially. I don't like to look like a prideful jerk, but anyone who simply clicked in here briefly would think the opposite...I haven't committed any sin, except in the case where I am wrong and refuse to admit it, in which case it is perjury.
Survivor of law-abiding parents. Church dissenter. Convicted adult. Using the anti-entitlement system to understand and advocate children's rights.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Benign" deprivation: Why saying "no" to children "frequent and often" can be child abuse
Many parents think that children need to hear the word "no" frequent and often. This is a common attitude amongst American parents...
-
Anyone with hacking powers is welcome to slip into my computer and phone, and correct the problem that Markie started. The reason should be ...
-
What it is like to be anti-spanking to the core? A bowl. A bowl of God's wrath, where you are always angry at parents over the spanking...
-
I am now accentuating the charge of supervision entitlement under the anti-entitlement charges against Marie Eaton. Eaton needs to stop logg...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.