I apologize for all the defenses on this blog, even though I don't have to. I don't like having a blog full of moral legal defenses against abuse and entitlement. It's like clutter all around. I, in real life, am simply not the most proud person around, meaning around children especially. I don't like to look like a prideful jerk, but anyone who simply clicked in here briefly would think the opposite...I haven't committed any sin, except in the case where I am wrong and refuse to admit it, in which case it is perjury.
Survivor of law-abiding parents. Church dissenter. Convicted adult. Using the anti-entitlement system to understand and advocate children's rights.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Positive reinforcement: The biblical application of positive reinforcement
Many parents believe in punishing children, with the norm being time-outs alongside the occasional spanking done "out of love". Ho...
-
Yep, that is an abusers' statement, some of the time, but not all of the time? Threats. Instead? Blocked memory. Clouded memory. DO NO...
-
I am now accentuating the charge of supervision entitlement under the anti-entitlement charges against Marie Eaton. Eaton needs to stop logg...
-
I apologize for not being active today in terms of posting. I went to the beach at North East, Maryland with my mother, and spent some quali...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.