"Presume" gaslighting, in incremental format: How I deal with parents

 How do I deal with parents, namely pro-spanking, punitive, and/or permissive parents in terms of interrogation. Pro-social presumption, pro-social increment. I hate parents, meaning all who defend entitlement, meaning all who identify by abuse or entitlement, meaning all of the above who are pro-spanking.

It says in John 7:24 KJV:

Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment

I presume innocence in all adults, beyond a reasonable doubt, as this was the standard of judgment in biblical times. With abuse against myself, I go by the model of many warnings, then either retreat and/or shun. Any verbal abuse is pro-social abuse to ward off a solicitor. If you are shouting and in my face, and following me around, in person or through airborne means, that is abuse, and as many times as I have warned you to leave, that as is many times you are guilty to God for your abuse towards me, even once you're gone if you leave without apology. Simply jumping in and helping every once and a while is not abuse, but when I say "please leave", and you say "but I think you need my help" then you become an abuser to me...Any interaction I perceive as abusive objectively can be seen as such, under Christian law, but at the same time, perceiving it all the time from everyone makes you a peacekeeper, by the conservative standard - someone who loves to take offense at every name they are called. EVERY CONTEXT is what I am referring to, not just every TRAUMATIC context. It is good to defend trauma, but if you defend everything else that is yours, and suspect the whole world and all of society of abusing you enough to abuse it, you are a peacekeeper. It is an arrogant attitude to have, and one that is predestined for Hell unless it is fought against. Pedophiles simply have a peacekeeper, and it is as minute as a tiny thread that can easily be managed.

With children, I am actually more cautious if I just get a whiff from the parents. That's not enough for an accusation against a parent, in fact. I must presume innocence, and interrogate in steps based on such, at least to start out with, especially parents here. The idea is to put the parent on trial, with the bias of pro-social fairness, meaning no bias and mean testing used. I favor towards academic gaslighting of the religious variety. Every post here can be seen as interrogating a pro-spanking parent, in some way.

A common interrogation would go:

Anti-spanking righteous judge: "Did you know that spanking is a violation of Divine Codified Jurisprudence?" 

Defendant: "You're nuts, loony bird. Spare the rod, spoil the child."

Anti-spanking righteous judge: "So you deny the biblical truth that the provocation of anger of a child imposes damages upon said child. Do you realize you are committing the moral crime of entitlement leading to theft? At least, I think you are, but you might just be doing what is right already, in which case that entitlement is merely an incorrect opinion"

Then, he would either say "Yep, I punish them. Lock me up now, officer" and I'd say "You are condemned to your fate, depraved spoog and speck". If they say "no, I don't spank..."...

The offender would have to bring up the topic themselves, usually in an Internet sessions. In real life, I interrogate the world through my line of sight, meaning I scowl at abusive parents in the store, pointing out to God their abusive attitude.

God hates such parents, with a force and fury so great that no man can fathom His mere existence. Many will be called to be parents, whereas few parents today treat children with respect. The rest are condemned to their fate in the ever-burning lake of fire and brimstone, suffering horror and torrent. Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand! Get help for that parental entitlement towards your child!