Policy statement on child abduction

 I have to make an obvious policy statement about child abduction. I omit "kidnapping" because that is the broader offense, meaning it is wrong, and is one of many ways that adults abuse children. Child abduction is one of the most serious crimes that a pedophile, by the clinical understanding, is capable of committing. We all, as adults, have it in us, under some level of distress, to remove a child from the providing custody of an inept parent. This is how it usually goes.

It says in Exodus 20:17 KJV:

And he that stealeth a man, and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death.

"found in his hand" was applied broadly under the Mosaic Law and opposed corporal punishment, as well as any unlawful acts of child abduction to remove the child from an abusive home. Child abduction was not a practice of the Israelites, and was unlawful under the Mosaic Law. Christians observe the spirit of the Law, in which case kidnapping is a major form of entitlement leading to theft. 

Child abduction is a form of victim entitlement projected onto the child, sadly a child that is already being abused. Most adults, including most pedophile adults, even in a weak state, don't snatch a child up. Where would I find the resources to care for a child? I just felt the urge to do something, every single time we went shopping. It was an anger and anxiety mixed that was at a low level that made you freeze - you could do nothing to help the poor child, and thought of dying yourself instead for being so helpless to save a child from imminent danger. This is a common struggle of most pedophiles I've known, and an antisocial pedophile could take it all the way, misuse verses like the one above, and then commit a horrific crime to add to horrific abuse...Instinctively, I knew I couldn't stop it, and that was scary, like it was happening to me, like my childhood was happening all over again. I just couldn't help but start a blog to journal my trauma. That is the main function of this blog today.

I don't step in by way of coercion or force of any kind, so not to overly disturb things. I step in with the least intrusive measures to achieve the desired result. The goal is not to avenge trauma, but to protect a child, so I would just voice my opinion, then shun the parents when they refused proper anti-spanking assistance. The child would naturally be removed from my life alongside the parents, as parents have providing custody over children, and I can't change an idiot's mind.

Nadine Block has been attacking my advocacy for a good reason, but with evil weapons that cancel out that good intentions. She is genuinely concerned about me traveling all the way to Delaware County and "checking out" her grandchildren. She says "cordoned off". They may want to be friends, but are they competent in that desire. The fact that their parents spank is more of a bright versus darkness, with child victims of corporal punishment being shrouded in darkness, as is the case with any trauma - you really stop there because the child is harmed and traumatized, and you do not add to that ever. 

Who failed the child in the case of pro-spanking parents having their child abducted? All the adults, meaning all of them, meaning all of them. It all blends together. Adults suck in this country, so hold us all accountable, myself included. Why add to an existing trauma that is horrific in and of itself? It's usually not just the parents either keeping that poor child down, but everyone who enables the parents, pointing down the line stating "respect parents" and backing them up - your whole community hates you. I never wanted to be kidnapped as a child. I wanted my father to experience that - locked up for something, meaning a sex crime he never committed, because I saw it as serious on those lines, as I do today.