Many people here know that I hate parents. All of them, at this point. Even a gentle parent, I hate that cord attached you, meaning the controlling entitlement that is innate of the parent class, making first class third class. I want to be wrong about you, yet am right about so many parents in our society.
It says in John 7:24 KJV:
Judge not according to the appearance, but judge with righteous judgment.
Judgment is for parent existence on the top level, and abuse existence on the lowest level, with a prideful, boastful parent most always leading to abusing a child. It is painstaking, in the form of counting the dead. Counting heads, counting tails, preparing for the rapture, when such lawful punishment is outlawed, and every single parent is locked up for disciplining their children as they wish, thus infringing on their parental choices and rights, being the wicked anti-spankers that we are. We want to violate your parental rights, and as long as it saves just one child, any other damage is collateral damage for a greater good which is protecting children, and we all at anti-spanking bloodlust pro-spanking parents, at least at some level...I want to be wrong about your existence, dear pro-spanking parent, yet I want to be right to protect a child.
Innocent until proven guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt. I question in increments, assuming the best in a parent here, while getting to the chase. It is asking around the parent, testing every which way, with fork judgment. Thus I must test the parent for innocence in some way, meaning ask a question that would lower my defenses if answered in non-guilty fashion. Generally, I'd ask open-ended questions and follow the trail from there, and then asking to clarify further to endure guilty intentions or clarify pro-social intentions...It is testing the parent all around, and if they say "yeah, I spank my kids" ask "Do you wish to seek help". They may defend themselves, so chew them out and shun them. If they agree to seek help, point them here.
I'm wrong about gentle parents being abusers, meaning they never were abusers, meaning if you abuse a child in any way you are not a gentle parent, meaning gentle parenting is not abused, and if it is ever criminalized to be a gentle parent, I will go to jail proudly.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.