Thursday, March 4, 2021

What it is like to be anti-spanking to the core

 Many pro-spanking parents defend their "right" to spank and punish children. The pro-spanking lobby is built on the lie that there has never been a credible anti-spanking survivors. Count me as one of them. We are terrorizing in our nature. Many are pedophiles, due to the low-level depth of the condition. I myself was a "worry"/"comfort" narcissist back in the day, when I was an abuser of children through sexual entitlement and harassment.

What is being an anti-spanking survivor? Think prison camp. Think compress. Think both, all in one. The feeling of childhood is one of repression, meaning the hot sun beating on your back, in chains and shackles, beholden to the every whim and want of adults - so I char myself to that moral legal standard as a form of pro-social self-revictimization. I work for nobody now but God, and children's rights is His extension, called to strike reverent fear and terror in the unbelieving and unwashed mob defending parental rights, which is the enemy of children everywhere. I was abused by that ideology from a very young age. Madrassah, in everyday, switchboard format, in a point out sort of way - how "the police could cite you with disorderly conduct if you pull X prank". How about charge the parents that model such an attitude? It is indoctrination from above coming down in chicken noodle soup...I passed that plate long ago. 

Am I talking about slavery? In the form of children's oppression, I am. That is how we as adults oppress children, in an extreme and mock-heroic way that demands the rights of adults while shoving the rights of children down the toilet, meaning my trauma does not exist to most people.

KILL PARENTAL RIGHTS! KILL DISCIPLINARY RIGHTS! That's why. Parent DON'T protect, and that's the problem. Instead, children self-protect and adults abstain...I am a servant and righteous slave to children as a form of Christian grace and payback. I give back to a community that I left.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

The word "no": Why children need to hear the word "no" seldom (meaning almost never)

Many parents think that children need to hear the word "no" frequent and often. This is a common attitude on the part of American ...