Thursday, March 4, 2021

Addendum: Policy concerning judgment of prejudicial pedophiles/abusers of pedophiles

I have a certain line of judgment for survivors here with two layers, the line of intent itself, and the perceived desire in the other person to have their traumas listened to, judging by the statements of the plaintiff/defendant.

I start out listening intently and actively on a children's rights screen, and showing the fellow survivor my welcome. When they show that they don't want to listen, I listen to that, and instead interrogate, using "presume" gaslighting in harsh, brusque application, in either the positive or the negative.

Most insults I just brush off and don't react to. I'm not a snowflake like that.
at
Labels: ,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Thanksgiving dinner: Why children have the right to be offended by physical contact

Many parents will be celebrating Thanksgiving this season. This is a time for children to be with extended family. Grandma may want a hug. B...

  • ANNOUNCEMENT: Apologies for lack of activity
    I apologize for not being active today in terms of posting. I went to the beach at North East, Maryland with my mother, and spent some quali...
  • Second statement indicting Marie Eaton
    I am now accentuating the charge of supervision entitlement under the anti-entitlement charges against Marie Eaton. Eaton needs to stop logg...
  • "I can't protect my love"
     Yep, that is an abusers' statement, some of the time, but not all of the time? Threats.  Instead? Blocked memory. Clouded memory. DO NO...