We HATE parental rights here at anti-parental entitlement. "Parental rights" can mean anything, but ultimately is was created not to protect children, but the self-interest of children. There are many strains of parental rights, some whom I include at my table as long as they respect my "parent" trauma. There is an enemy, and that enemy is over there by my perception, as conservative Christians learn to see even commonplace, conventional threats, as distant.
These entitled parents are the type of fake conservative to think that parents are the only way to protect children is through the parents, and that "parents protect". That is completely ridiculous and laughable, as parents have s very poor track record of protecting children, at all, really. Even from their own demons, especially from their own reason.
Yes, fake family values people that don't know what family values are, and don't read their own Bible, which states not to provoke a child to anger through inflicted damages. Do they not know the hypocrisy of their parent behavior? They claim to be Christians in every respect, and many times are, except for one area - parenting.
Groups I'd consider to be pro-abuse would be any group with a pro-spanking policy, or else any pedophile group that endorse "child emancipation" explicitly in the title or official statements.
These people who think the parents can solve it all are entitled, in a naive way - defending naivety to defend their own self-interests.
I don't hate everything parental rights. I ultimately hate the term "parental right", meaning there is no need to use that word except to justify abuse. Call it something else. Custody rights, in a nasty divorce? Protection rights, in terms of protecting a child, just call it that. It's called a parental rights trauma, in children's rights application. It's something you pull out to SCARE AND FRIGHTENED those focking parents, spooking them.
Parents are far from the sole entity that protects children, and I shouldn't have to through a set of parents in order to remedy abuse. Parents need to accept that even they, the proud and entitled royalty over children, have someone to answer to - hopefully simply their child, but if they refuse, they consent to answering to the state instead...We at children's rights want to take away your disciplinary rights to punish or control your child in order to "keep them in line". Many will be called to parenting, but few have been called. Those that do don't wear the label, but imply it in their good care of their child.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.