Friday, March 5, 2021

Parent-to-parent gaslighting: How I gaslight you, parent (and vice-versa)

 Many people do not understand that spanking is already banned in America. As a parent, your rights are limited, even as the secular law allows "reasonable force" in parenting. God's Law is above the law of the land, and the good God from Above says never to provoke a child to anger through violence or personal slights.

Parent-to-parent gaslighting is an equal exchange of suspicion and action based on said suspicion from parent-to-parent, and also help and assistance between parents. It says in 1 Corinthians 5:11 KJV:

But now I have written to you not to keep company, if that is called a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolator, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner, with one an no not to eat.

That's the ultimate penalty I impose on a parent - not eat with them, or if absolutely necessary, have no conversation with them while eating, thus eating alongside them and not with them, as a form of moral shunning. Ultimately, however, I gaslight parents by determining the periphery of existence that is allotted to them by their perception, meaning everywhere in most cases, meaning everywhere in sight or sense. Sometimes, I can't get an entitled parent, say, in a public venue, to move, so I look to them, and cast them on their way.

It says John 7:24 KJV:

Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.

The Greek root word translated "judge" is κρινο (Latin: krino) and refers to, in the Christian context, circular courtroom judgment, meaning presumption of innocence beyond a reasonable doubt, with superficial suspicion ("beyond what the eye can see"). 

I judge you, as a symbolic parent and fellow adult, for how you treat your child. If you choose to be a gentle parent, I am okay with you 100%, and presume every parent to have capacity to be one of us, until they defend otherwise, thereby defending their existence with the glorified label "parent" or "children", in which case I question them directly when on my page, and indirectly when on other pages. That word, when defended in first-person, tells me that you are a threat.

In return, parents can judge to see if I am a pedophile, which signs can include things such as eyes going towards the child, and so forth. When anyone here sees me writing about "this girl" all the time, notify the authorities (PA ChildLine is 1-800-932-0313) and/or warn the girl's parents. Question me as well.

Hang 'em up, then nail 'em 'til the third day. Set an example. Let the parents burn!

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

The word "no": Why children need to hear the word "no" seldom (meaning almost never)

Many parents think that children need to hear the word "no" frequent and often. This is a common attitude on the part of American ...