Monday, March 8, 2021

Opposing religious abuse of pedophiles - Why sexual fantasies are not sin

 Many people hate pedophiles, but most people think that pedophile hatred, as pedophiles understand it, are from children's rights advocates and stereotype all pedophiles as opposing the age of consent. However, most pedophiles do not support lowering the age of consent. Pro-pedophile is a children's rights cause within a cause, as the most impacted group of pedophiles by anti-pedophile stigma are not sex offenders, but perhaps their victims. Victims of abuse for sure. The worst yet best in society, at the very worst yet best. Child/pedophile. Most that are "out" to parents are girls, not boys. Most all children with the condition were abused by parents in some way and some form.

Child/pedophile does not simply mean, in this context, any child that abuses another child, nor does child/pedophile, when I use the term, have anything to do with the subject of child-on-child sexual abuse. We are talking those of the clinical/medical sort, sometimes in trajectory format and some able to be officially diagnosed. They face abuse of pedophiles by the most common of sources - abusive religious parents. However, sexual fantasy about children is not sin.

It says in Matthew 5:27-28 KJV:

Ye have heard it was said of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery: But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman out of lust committeth adultery with her already in his heart.

Christ was, here, simply reiterating the Law, and either amending it or taking it further, meaning showing existing extensions in the Law. This refers to the Tenth Commandment, particularly the Greek root word επιθυμέω (Latin: epithmeo) and refers to planning against a child, in the realm of pedophiles and pedophilia, not simply having sexual fantasy. 

Child sexual abuse is sin, according to biblical law, and is denoted by the Greek root word πορνεία (Latin: porneia) and refers to the slightest of sexual contact with a child, either verbal, physical, or symbolic, ranging from leering/menacing to rape/lust murder, regardless of the intent of the perpetrator. It is sexually entitled contact that colors the intent of the perpetrator, defiling them. Any adult sexual entitlement is ultimately a form of covetousness, and is denoted by the Greek root word πγεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to wanting sexual contact or favors from a child to the point of seeking to impose said control or harassment onto a child, leading to kidnapping/abuse. 

Sexual fantasy is not sexual abuse unless shared with a child or on a public platform where children can see, as a form of sexual gaslighting. Documenting a sexual fantasy about a child, in and of itself, is abuse in and of itself. Defending plans or "rights" to abuse a child is abusing in and of itself. That was what Christ was saying on the Sermon on the Mount.

Many who aren't pedophiles, and are reading this, should understand the kind of trauma I am writing to. It is present-future religious gaslighting trauma, centering upon the teaching of predestination, which is the public service announcement to all pedophiles within the United States and around the world. They are told that their mere condition will lead to them abusing a child "like predestined fate", as many abusive therapists would say. Many therapists say this to clients, and then the client has a meltdown and ends up crying. This is because the setup of the therapy is flawed, and should be more person-centered, meaning listening reflectively and occasionally giving validating and necessary advice, that the parent/pedophile would, many times, rebel with denial, then bounce back the next session thanking the therapist (that was my relationship with my therapist)...By listening, we aren't talking about listening to sexual fantasies, but maybe fears of abusing a child, in which case the answer I got was "What are you going to do about it?" and then brainstorm. In that environment, I made the choice to restrict myself around children, meaning not associate with them at all, to the level of speech. My therapist talked me out of working with children, and into sheltered workshop. I didn't like the advice, but she was right.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Birth nudity: Why God wants birth nudity in the family home

Many parents believe that children deserve punishment when they cry. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American paren...