"Trust" framing: How I deal with parents

 What is "trust" framing. How I deal with the pro-spanking parents in star judgment format. I, as an advocate, support parent-to-parent judgment with an anti-spanking basis, I don't trust parents on the lowest level, but on the surface, I trust most any parent I pass in the store. 

Parents, as a whole, when speaking rationally, are a group of people I trust yet distrust, and so I observe and bear witness to a fallen world that hates children. On the surface, I see the parent - a calm, sordid, nihilstic feeling. The parent simply exists as a human entity, and otherwise has no assumed existence. All assumptions as to parenting views are dropped. Pro-social diversity means that even that family wearing Trump Revolution shirts could possibly be one of us, while knowing elsewhere, reading statistics, that it is quite unlikely, just like if they were wearing Biden shirts. Pro-social diversity is, ultimately, a punitive tool when sitting at the desk of a children's rights platform, knowing that your abuser knows no stripes, meaning can be anyone in this country. Most likely, the person you shake hands with is the person using that hand on a child's buttocks. But, shake their hands anyway, to show how dire it really is...I have a universal abuser, of the most universal variety - I myself fit the profile, in a lopsided way, meaning I am a pedophile, and so I work on it.

When I start distrusting you is when I start a parent investigation, which presumes innocence in the parent, beyond a reasonable doubt, with bias of unbiased superficial suspicion, in fork format. If I have any reason to trust that you are innocent, I go by that, but knowing, by way of superficial suspicion, that something is not up, asking questions further until I hit a place where I have found damages. The defendant then must plead guilty, and accept the damages, repaying them with an apology, or else, if there is a defense, shunning the offender from the land, until they agree to return to my compound, and repay with an apology, then receiving legal forgiveness. I can decline legal forgiveness any time I deem you to be insincere, which might happen after repeated shuns/fallings out. At that point, you have burnt all trust in me, and you need to work to get it back.

Trust is earned in life, now bestowed on a platter. If I don't trust you as a parent to be around children, you'll surely know. I believe in frank honesty, not dancing around a subject. That can be noted from my writing. I do talk similarly in real life, but don't give religious orders to my mother, and even if I do, not in religious speak itself (pro-social questioning, in hastened format)...I don't want you to trust me. I am not entitled to trust from survivors. But, a lot do trust what I do here, and I am grateful. They are understanding, but in a conservative, cautious way that resonates with me.