Yep, now I can't track the "inboxes" that track views

 "He doesn't care what we think, so we can do whatever we want" - so we know that, so we don't care what you think when we expose you and you ridicule us.

Not that I really care. It's kind of childish, except for the fact that it comes from somewhere. Get all the facts down. I instinctively do that, it seems.

Perhaps this was a past tense grudge documented in a recording discrepancy, to be fair, but I don't believe a word you say, Robbyn. GTFO of children's rights. I don't care about your rights.

You are trying to attack me, and then accuse me of doing the same, with me staying on my page, while you send all these airborne messages to me. How do you send them? If I go to your pages to attack you, ban me and call the authorities. So any comment is an attack? Your page, your rules. You leave me alone, working for the pro-spanking scum - vile and depraved scum such as Focus on the Family. You go back over to where you came from, meaning where you belong - parent-land. YOU leave, or we get you out - an order to the rest from me. I rarely give lawful commands to the conglamorate, but I am now giving an S.O.S,.

Otherwise:

1. Accept that I am here.
2. Prove that the messages I am getting of you do, in fact, depict past-tense events/controversies.

Note that even if I come to a realization that I am battling a past tense Robbyn, I judge parents and other abusers by way of predation instincts that are anger based. Attacking my predation instincts the wrong way, largely in person, could do a lot of damage. I am convicted of Christian beliefs against physical violence except in self-defense (including force for survival and sustenance). My instincts for reverse gaslighting are based on the concepts of pro-social bunker/hide, pro-social floorboard, pro-social abuser run aground. Basically, it is allowing your abuser to fight you, while fighting them head on, until they run out of steam. I don't "raid pages", except to flag them, and only when they are a front for abuse of OTHER PEOPLE, meaning not myself, and most likely children - only when I have every reason to believe that 1) the page OWNER is using the page as a front for child abuse of some kind, including the domestic kind and also 2) the specifically worded comment will not cause harm to any balance/imbalance in any family home, or else will so to the least intrusive degree possible, and also 3) One is willing to admit they are wrong, including accepting any ban for any reason. Flags of pages should be rare. Flagging every page will lead to the righteous judge to devolve into peacekeeperism of the moral legal variety. On call. Up-and-atom.

It seems Robbyn is being framed, and so I forgive her, meaning absolving her of guilt. "Forgiveness" simply means "you did nothing wrong, by law". It doesn't mean I have to trust who I forgive. I will simply keep an eye on her, and not let my guard down. Perhaps I will learn to trust you a great deal, Robbyn. I do think certain pedophiles/sexual abusers do deserve harsh treatment, but I do not take kindly to being lumped in with them, at all. So you profile "pedophiles" (abusers of children who are falsely branded as my self-diagnosed label)? Yep, I see it as a checklist, and them running up the track. What about those you don't see there? What about those you talk to in child interviews, who don't tell you, but you just know - full of anger, and want to overthrow their abusive parents due to that incident. They have nothing on their computer but swimsuit pictures of little girls, and want to teach children when they grow up. Sensitive. Shy. Secretive. I think you understand, more than you give yourself credit for. You don't need anti-CR. You understood better beforehand. Come home, Robbyn, from parent-land. I miss you, meaning the real you. That's all. Oh, I'll stay off your page, because the real Robbyn is consorting with the enemy for understandable reasons.