Autism spectrum disorder: Why the fetal position quells autistic aggression instantly

Quite a few parents have to deal with it. 1 in 68 children will be born with autism. Autism spectrum disorder is a mental health disorder where the individual specializes all their energy and talents in one area. Most people are generalizers, meaning people generally generalize on facts. An individual with autism specializes all their knowledge and talent in one area, excluding and abandoning all other areas of fact. This specialized setup can cause serious learning disabilities for individuals with autism, who are designed only for that one thing. Usually, autism comes with another disorder that may cause aggression and oppositional-defant traits.

I myself have autism. As a child, I was aggressive and defiant. Most adults did not know what to do in order to deal with my aggressive behavior. In various school settings, I was restrained, secluded, and punished. Most parents of children with autism think that seclusion policies are the way to go, and at my old school, the parents pushed the seclusion policies as part of their Lovaas ABA agenda. Lovaas is an intensive form of ABA. Many schools like the one I went to also have behavioral specialists that consult with parents at home, implementing false behaviorist measures in the home. As an advocate for children, I am not for any sort of behaviorist intervention for children, but instead for attachment-based methods in dealing with children. The ultimate response for open defiance or aggression should be holding the child in the fetal position. The fetal position quells autistic aggression instantly, with the right nurturing attitude towards the child.

The fetal position is a concept that exists within the context of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. Parents are to be submissive to children, just as mankind is submissive to God, with parents being the enemy of them/Him. In return, children are to rest safely and securely in the love and submission of parents. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children as they would submit to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the submission of parents. Parents are to submit to their children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children too many times. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong. Paul here was lifting up this legal context in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child.

Children, in biblical times, wore abosolutely no clothing, at all, until they became adults. Women only wore clothing outside the home, and otherwise went in the nude, in order to serve both their husbands and their children, separately. Mothers served their children in biblical times by way of providing for them nourishment and sustenance, namely using attachment parenting items such as breastfeeding and skin-on-skin comfort. When children were especially aggressive or defiant, in biblical times, mothers grabbed hold of them, and curled up with them on the ground, in the fetal position. This shut down the aggression and defiance instantly. Children with autism lived in those times, and children with autism were either "stand-beside-me" children who simply stood beside mothers, or else were very cuddly and snuggly with their mothers into the young adult years. Both types of children were prone to aggression at times. Usually, mothers responded to aggression with tears, but when a child was highly energized - as can happen with autism - the child was treated with the fetal position in order to calm down the energized nervous system of the child with autism.

The broader environment for the fetal position treatment should always be in a situation where the child has a secure attachment with parents and caregivers. Children with autism are capable of making strong bonds with others. Their ability to make strong bonds with others starts with how strong of a bond they have with their mother. Being in relationship with mothers teaches children with autism how to form and keep social relationships. Some with autism are interested in making friends, and some of us don't care much about making friends. I pretty much only want children to be my friend, due to being a pedophile. Pedophilia is a form of immature autism where the autistic specialty is in children, including in terms of who the individual wants to be their friend, with this specialty being guided by low-level sexual preference. It is not a psychopathic or antisocial disorder. Secure attachment is when your child trusts you in everything, enough that they will confide their every emotion and upset into you, at natural intensity, not inhibiting themselves or their emotions in anything. 

The fetal position should ideally be done in skin-on-skin format, to add extra comfort for the upset or agitated child, in the form of mammary closeness to children. In public, obviously the fetal position cannot be done in the middle of a store. That is when you wait until you get to the car, and then curl up in the back seat, tucking the child underneath your shirt.

In school settings, it is a myth that new laws prohibit touching a student for any reason other than to restrain them. Here in Pennsylvania, under 22 Pa. Code §14.133, "briefly holding, without force, a student or eligible young child in order to calm or comfort him...". Treating a child with the fetal position usually involves picking them up and curling up with them on the ground in order to comfort them through the upset. School policies may prohibit this intervention, but state laws allow it, and official school policies usually allow it as well. Some force may need to be used with older students, but only in the form of a forced tackle/hug that can be made to be playful in nature. 

Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) usually need the same kind of positive behavioral supports that a typically developing child needs. Most of the attention in terms of making parenting more gentle and non-punitive is directed towards children with autism. The reasons for this non-punitive parenting are also pertinent to non-autistic children. Most autism parents seek to form a bond with their children, and teach their children through that bond. That's what all children need. However, a child with autism is like a mirror - they reflect to you clearly what you are doing to them, and do to you as a parent what you are doing to them. This is known as echolalia, and this is why lawful trauma shows more in autistic children than in typically-developing children. ALL children need the type of close bond that autism mothers aim for. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Family values policing: Why anti-entitlement policing is the way to enforce a corporal punishment ban

Many people have no clue how the police system operates. I myself as an advocate for children have been under investigation by the City of Reading Police Department and the Pennsylvania State Police Reading Barracks, on suspicion of child-on-child sexual abuse. In the gaslighting tape that is the investigation, I have learned a lot about policing (which is a sign of innocence). How would I want my abuser to be investigated. My main abuser is the parent. I support family values policing, meaning anti-entitlement policing, but with a focus on attachment parenting family values.

Family values policing is something you can find in the Bible. It says in John 7:24 KJV:

Judge not by the appearances, but judge righteous judgment.

"Righteous judgment" then referred to a specific standard of judgment that presumed innocence in everyone and everything, beyond a reasonable doubt. The way moral crimes were judged then was that if there was any doubt as to the validity of the allegation, the suspect was deemed innocent until the righteous judge ran out of doubts, and then the offender was deemed guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

The way family values policing would be used to enforce a corporal punishment ban would be that the child's statement would be taken, and then the parent would be confronted alongside caseworkers to test for entitlement, and if the parents defended themselves in any way, they would be charged. Another way parents would be confronted would be hacking into electronics to monitor parents, as every electronic device has a camera installed in it so that law enforcement can monitor activity and abuse patterns within a home.

I myself, as a children's rights vigilante, judge like a family values policeman, meaning I presume innocence in everyone and everything around me, beyond a reasonable doubt. I doubt the guilt of an individual until I can doubt no more. I sort out the world into who is entitled versus who is not entitled, meaning you can be guilty yet not entitled, in which case I cut you a break just as Christ does.

It started out that everyone here in Berks County, Pennsylvania, was under the jurisdiction of a family values police officer. Ardent leftists did not like the police, usually mentioning how "helpy" they were, and wanted gaslighting police instead. So, they put the police "on a diet" where they were promised a rape as a reward for catching a criminal, with this known as predator policing, which is now the standard statewide here in Pennsylvania. This came with gaslighting in a way that was entitled in and of itself. Gaslighting entitlement is generally a form of control entitlement, sometimes also a form of sexual entitlement, and it has since eroded away all trust with the police. Nobody wants to talk to the police anymore. Everyone is afraid of getting gaslit themselves just for talking to the police.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!  

The "electra" and "oedipus" complexes: The key to how to prevent child sexual abuse

Many parents think that child sexual abuse is caused solely by pedophiles. This is a common belief amongst American parents. Most American parents think that pedophiles are the cause of all our woes when it comes to the child sexual abuse epidemic. The fact of the matter is that most child sexual abuse has little to do with pedophiles, and everything to do with one facet of our sinful nature - the electra complex. 

Every single adult is guilty merely for existing in relation to children, and is deserving of nothing but DEATH and PUNISHMENT merely for existing in relation to children. All adults are capable of the worst forms of child abuse under the right/wrong conditions, and thus all adults have an entitlement to keep in check. The electra and oedipus complexes, as first theorized by Sigmund Freud, are central to the risk of sexual offending amongst all adults, but especially parents. 

Child sexuality can be understood as a form of criss-cross in terms of paths. Boys between the ages of 3 and 6 naturally form a sexual attraction to their mothers, which is usually unrequited. Girls between the ages of 3 and 6 often form sexual attraction for their fathers, and vice versa. Today, these complexes, which were out in the open in biblical times, are repressed today in the minds of most Americans. That's where danger lurks.

Most child sexual abuse comes from repressed sexual desire that is repressed by the offender to the point where it comes out sideways onto the victim, usually when the child victim and perpetrator are alone with each other. It is usually a packet of repressed sexual drive that comes out onto the child. Usually, the offender would not meet the diagnostic criteria for pedophilic disorder as per the DSM-5. 

The answer is pro-social fantasy about one's child. The Greek root word denoting lust and inordinate affections in the New Testament is επιθυμέω (Latin: epithumeo) and refers not to ordinary sexual desire, nor to sexual desire about children, nor to even incestuous desire. This word refers to sexual entitlement, as defined as, officially speaking, sexual want, to the point of sexually motivated approach. The idea behind avoiding sexually abusing a child is watching your intent in approaching a child. When alone and with only yourself, it actually would be wise to masturbate to thoughts of children you are attracted to.

Pro-social fantasy, when practiced properly - meaning every time - can improve the relationship between children and the parent of the opposite sex. Fathers usually end up reeling themselves down to the child's level, being a playmate to the child. One flaw of this setup is that not every child is treated equally by the father. No child should be mistreated by the father, as that isn't what occurs in such homes. But, some children are ignored more than others. The mother is the one that sees the children clearly and equally. Fathers are best for protection and keeping guard for external threats. Mothers also protect children, mainly from internal threats such as the sexual entitlement of fathers. 

When the opposite-sex sexual complexes between parent and child are brought to the surface, they will be much easier to manage. Adult attraction to children is easiest to control when it is on the surface, and you can "see" your intent in relation to your child. Otherwise, you may have intent towards your child and not know it, and if this is the case, that intent needs to be discharged at once through masturbation. Try and experiment, especially if you are a non-pedophile, and fantasize about a child sexually. Where do you go? Most men, according to researchers, go towards their own daughters, and are shocked about it later. They didn't even know they were capable of such a thing. The idea is, once you get past the initial shock, to keep on going until it feel comfortable to fantasize about your daughter as a father. Then, you'll likely feel more comfortable with your own daughter.

The depraved and decadent, defiled sexual abusers of children will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into torrents of Hell-fire! Repent! 

Honor your parents: Understanding the Fifth Commandment in context

Many parents think they are entitled to being honored. This is a common belief and attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents want to be honored, to the point that they demand honor from children, and back it up by punishment. Most people think that "honor parents" means don't speak against parents. The fact of the matter is that it means do not commit acts of clear and deliberate elder abuse against a parent, and otherwise, sets up the concept of providing custody for children.

It says in Exodus 20:12 KJV:

Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.

This commandment, in context, was understood not as a prohibition of all speaking against parents, but instead committing honor offenses against parents that were specifically laid out, namely in the parent protection laws. "Do not strike your parents" meant do not repeatedly beat your parents, as an independent adult, usually with the offender paying a rude visit to their parents and then beating them. "Do not curse your parents" means do not administer airborne gaslighting and send your parents on their merry way, usually coming from a rude visit, but can also come from care-dependent adults if the gaslighting came from rape. Apart from that, let the secular law be your guide in determining what is elder abuse, thus dishonoring to parents, and the law, depending on what state you are in, makes quite a few amendments to the parent protection laws. Obey the secular law for God's sake, not your punishment's sake. Elder abuse was a widely misunderstood topic in Ancient Israelite society, where an allegation of elder abuse was often met by the victim-blaming excuse of "they must have learned it from somewhere". The courts weren't doing anything about the case, even though they could, and so God laid down the parent protection laws to enable the courts to investigate and prosecute cases of dishonoring parents, meaning elder abuse.

The Fifth Commandment is repeated in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children, lest they be discouraged. 

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children just as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the submission of parents. Parents are to submit to their children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commadment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment in biblical times was seen as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up this legal context in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing their children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child.

Children, in biblical times, wore absolutely no clothing, at all, until they became adults. Mothers only wore clothing outside the home, and otherwise went in the nude, in order to serve their husbands and their children, separately. Mothers served their children by way of providing for them nourishment and sustenance, namely using attachment parenting items such as breastfeeding and skin-on-skin comfort. Children up until age 6 never left the side of mothers, with young children ranging beside their mothers when at home, sometimes clinging to her when crying or upset. Children who were crying or upset were given skin-on-skin comfort and reassured with the words "this too will pass". When out and about, young children were wrapped up next to the bosom of mothers in swaddling blankets, suckling the teat of mothers when milk-hungry. Mothers in biblical times co-slept next to their children in skin-on-skin format, forming a secure attachment with them, and guarding them from all predatory threats, including the sexual entitlement of fathers. Fathers also formed a secure attachment with children, by way of witnessing skin-on-skin closeness and intimacy between mother and child, and wanting in on the situation by way of a sexual attachment to the child, where the father imprints on the child through masturbatory orgasm. Pro-social fantasy such as this led to fathers and children having a strong bond, with fathers acting as a playmate that sometimes came around and played games with the children. Fathers were always there to praise and encouragely lavishly bold feats of independence. 

Children in biblical times were under the providing custody of both their parents, but with mothers being the primary caregiver of children. Parents in biblical times were caregivers of children, not lawgivers or lawmakers. The Fifth Commandment only prohibits elder abuse as dishonoring parents, at the highest bar of severity. Otherwise, the Fifth Commandment only provides for parental headship over children, where parents are the head of the household, but in a loving way that provides for the every vulnerable need of children, expecting absolutely nothing in return, including praise or accolades. Parents should be there to care for their children, not enforce law or regimented rules on children. Ancient Jewish parenting was very warm and caring, with children co-sleeping next to mothers and clinging next to her in order to form a secure attachment with mothers. Ancient Israel and the Early Church were attachment parenting societies, meaning parental headship simply meant parents were providers of nourisment and sustenance. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Oppositional-Defiant Disorder: Why children with ODD need less limits (not more)

Many parents think that Oppositional-Defiant Disorder (ODD) is a manufactured disorder, stemming from "an epidemic of permissiveness". This is a common stance amongst many parents, and even professionals dealing in children's mental health. Most people link ODD to a permissive home where children don't know the limits. The fact of the matter, however, is that ODD is a mental health disorder in children that is usually secondary to another mental health disorder in a child, namely autism, ADHD, and/or bipolar disorder, where the child is on hightened alarm against any outside control from adults. A child with ODD needs a non-controlling environment in order to thrive. 

Children with ODD need to be allowed to rest. Secure and safe rest in parents is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission between parents and children. Parents are to be submissive to children, just as mankind is to be submissive to God, with parents being the enemy of them/Him. In return, children rest securely in the love and submission of parents. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the submission of parents. Parents are to submit to their children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God. 

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offenses perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statue prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for doing the wrong thing, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up this legal context in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, snd opposed any and all punishment of a child.

Children, in biblical times, wore absolutely no clothing, at all, until they became adults. Women only wore clothing outside of the home, and otherwise went in the nude, in order to serve both their husbands and their children, separately. Mothers served their children by way of nourishment and sustenance, namely using attachment parenting items such as breastfeeding or skin-on-skin closeness. In Ancient Jewish culture, there existed "stand-beside-me" children, where children who were too high-energy to cling to mother simply stayed by her side, with the only limit being that they could not leave her side. They could hit, kick, or bite mothers when frustrated, or else swear and curse at their mothers when angry with their parents. They had so much energy at such a young age that they could not be held to the bosom of mothers for constant comfort like other young children.

It is a myth that children with ODD need more limits. A child with ODD isn't simply a child who doesn't know the boundaries, or wasn't taught the boundaries. A child with ODD is a child with control issues, meaning they want control over the circumstances of their lives. They want things to go their way. Children with ODD have a strong counterwill, meaning if you try to control them, they will control back in any way they can and see fit. This leads to power struggles between parent and child. That is why you do not control a child with ODD at all.

The proper formula for dealing with children with ODD is give up the fight, then give in to to the demands of the child. The idea is to submit to your child fully and dutifully, meaning give up and give in to their demands. Cloistered environments where parents are constantly scheduling events and setting limits are not the best environments for a child with ODD. They just need time to be themselves. This means parents should allow children to issue orders and edicts on them.

Usually, children with ODD need discipline and strictness, but that must come in the form of children being strict with themselves, NOT adults being strict with children. When you are strict with a child, they learn to think for you when controlling themselves, and when you aren't around, their source of self-control is gone. Children must learn how to chasten themselves up and control themselves, and that starts with parents modeling that godly discipline for children. As a parent, you should declare yourself a depraved and decadent sinner who is deserving of absolutely nothing, and this will surely chasten you up. When your child sees you doing this, they will do it too, as long as there is a secure attachment between parent and child. 

The abovementioned secure attachment starts with closeness and intimacy in skin-on-skin closeness in early childhood, as well as breastfeeding for milk-dependent children. This secure attachment, with a child with ODD, might need to be more distant in terms of contact compared to closeness with other children. Perhaps simply be there for them to share their feelings, and never punish them for their feelings, so that they can trust you with their feelings later. When you show self-control to them when they are lashing out at you, you are teaching them self-control. When they hit you or are physically aggressive, cry and exclaim how they hurt you. That usually stops children in their tracks, and then that is the last time they hit you.

I myself was a child with oppositional-defiant traits. My oppositional defiant traits went away with medication, which is often the case, but I had to recover for the lost growth by being very strict with myself, and that's where the Holy Spirit naturally guided me. But, it was a non-controlling environment that nurtured this newly formed discipline and self-control. You control a child, and they learn to rely on others for control. A child has to learn to control THEMSELVES, using their own resolve to find discipline and self-control. This usually requires children to follow the lead of a role model, namely their parents, who they should have a secure attachment to. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Valentine's Day: Why love for children is a commandment for all adults

Many parents think that they love their children. This is a common attitude amongst American parents, usually rearing its head as a means to control a child. As a child, I got told "I love you" as a justification for punishment. Most parents, in fact, do not love their children. God prescribes a special form of love for one's own child. Love is submission, and submission is love. 

Valentine's Day is here, and the original meaning of the holiday (lost in commercialism) involves the highest form of love - dying for your neighbor at the hands of a persecutor. Valentine was the first Christian to be martyred, with martyrdom being the highest expression of Christian love. You can celebrate Valentine's Day with your children, and show them how loving and loyal you are to them. Valentine's day is about Christian Agape love, or taking up the cross for someone else, namely your child.

Christian love for one's child is a commandment in the Bible. It says in Matthew 22:35-40 KJV:

Then one of them, which was a lawyer, asked him a question, tempting him, and saying, Master, which is the greatest commandment in the law. Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets. 

The Greek root word translated "love" here is αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and refers to, in the context of parenting, prioritizing children first, and yourself last, to the point of dutiful and selfless submission as you would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in relation to God. True Love does not come from a place of pride or desire, but instead fearful conviction, where parents come to the conviction that they are depraved and decadent sinners deserving of absolutely nothing. This conviction leads to a sense of worthlessness in the sinner/parent, prompting the sinner/parent to earn their worth by doing good works. Children were loved in biblical times as the neighbor of adults, in a vulnerable way, and were seen as vulnerable appearances of God.

Parents are to be love their children and be submissive to them, just as mankind is to be submissive to God, with adults as the sworn enemy of children, just as mankind is the sworn enemy of God. In return, children are to rest safely and securely in the love and submission of parents. This is the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children as they would God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the submission of parents. Parents are to submit to children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as they would God.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up this legal context in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child.

Love is martyrdom, and martyrdom is love, with attachment parenting being the ultimate martyrdom for any parent towards their child. Children, in biblical times, wore absolutely no clothing, at all, until they became adults. Women only wore clothing outside the home, and otherwise went in the nude, in order to serve both their husbands and their children, separately. Mothers served their children by way of providing for them nourishment and sustenance, namely using attachment parenting items such as breastfeeding and skin-on-skin comfort. Children up until age 6 never left the side of mothers, ranging next to mothers when inside the house, sometimes clinging to her when crying or upset. Children who were crying or upset were reassured and comforted with skin-on-skin closeness and the words "this too will pass". When out and about, young children were wrapped up next to the bosom of mothers in swaddling blankets, suckling her teat if milk-dependent. By night, mothers co-slept next to children in skin-on-skin format, in order to forge a secure attachment with her children, and also guard them from all predatory threats, including the sexual entitlement of fathers. Fathers also formed a secure attachment with children, by way of witnessing skin-on-skin closeness between mother and child, with the father wanting in on the action through forming a sexual attachment to children, and imprinting on them through mastutbatory orgasm. This occasional sexual fantasy on the part of the father improved the father-child relationship, making it closer and more selfless on the part of the father. Fathers in biblical times related to their children like a human ragdoll, with the mother being the more sturdy parent. Actual child sexual abuse was rare next to non-existent in biblical times, with the sexual abuse of children being severely punished in both the Old and New Testament. In the New Testament, adult fornicators of children were excommunicated permanently, with no hope of forgiveness from the parish that they offended. 

So, find some special time with your child this Valentine's Day, since it is God's command to love everybody. This Valentine's Day, we celebrate the Christian gift of love, and this can include any love, in any relationship, that has Christian roots. Spend some quality time with your child, taking your child hand in hand, maybe snuggling with your child tonight. Loving affection and attention are core attachment needs, and Love is putting the needs of your child above your own. It is a Christian command to love your child as a vulnerable neighbor.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

How to parent your pedophilic child

Many people misunderstand the source of pedophile hysteria. Many people these days are supportive to the needs and aims of non-offending pedophiles. Most people either hate or else do not understand non-offending pedophiles. The core of the hysteria is not children's rights, but a few abusive religious parents who impose their false and abusive religious beliefs onto their pedophilic children.

What is pedophilia? Most people think all pedophiles are narcissists. The fact of the matter is that pedophilia is a form of immature autism, where the age-oriented sexual development of the pedophile is arrested in time, and corresponds most of the time with arrested emotional development. Usually, pedophiles are as immature as the children they are attracted to. Most pedophiles have an autistic speciality in children, in terms of knowledge and social relational skills. Most pedophiles are ambiverts, meaning they relate well to children, but relate in a clumsy, quirky way with everyone else, or else not at all in some cases. Autism is where an individual is "one" and has no connections with anyone, except maybe to a caregiver. A pedophile has a form of autism where they are "one" with children, and this is directed by their sex drive. Pedophilia is simply sexual immaturity within a case of autism.

Ultimately, the prejudicial hysteria against pedophiles starts at home, as a form of religious child abuse committed by abusive religious parents. Most pedophiles are victims of a form of child sexual abuse known as sexual shaming abuse. Ultimately, pedophile hysteria comes from an idea, not a group of people. One Bible passage used to oppress pedophiles is Matthew 5:27-28 KJV:

Ye have heard that it was said of them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery: But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her is his heart.

The Greek root word translated "lust" is επιθυμέω (Latin: epithumeo) and refers not to ordinary sexual desire, or even sexual desire towards children. This word refers to sexual entitlement, as defined as, officially speaking, sexual want, to the point of sexually motivated approach. Masturbation was actually expected for sexual thoughts about children, and mandatory for pedophiles who were celibate and single due to lack of attraction to adults. Yet, the anti-pedophile lobby often shames pedophilic children with this spiritually abusive message that their own natural sexual feelings are evil and to be avoided. 

What does your pedophilic child need? All a pedophile needs is someone to talk to about their disorder, and the younger they are when they first disclose, the better. They need a parent that they can trust in entirely. This means that parents need to abstain from punishment, in all cases, so that they can get honest testimony from their child as to their sexual experiences. Also, allow your pedophilic child the right to masturbate whenever he/she feels the need to relieve themselves. It is not a moral crime for your child to masturbate to thoughts of sex with children. Just make sure they don't use images intended as pornography in order to fancy their desires.

I myself had an understanding upbringing in relation to my pedophilia. I had both my parents to talk to. Both my parents switched to gentle parenting at that point. I also have a therapist to talk to if the issue becomes pathological again, and I relapse into my pedophilic disorder. I have plenty of people to talk to about my disorder. I wish all pedophiles had what I had, as I am very fortunate, and very grateful in that. Pedophilic children don't have a political agenda, and don't deserve sexual abuse and shaming from parents.

The depraved and decadent, defiled adult fornicators of children that sexually correct pedophilic children will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into a Hell-fire of torrents! Repent!