"Healthy pedophilia": Why the left wants to legalize sex with children

Many parents think that "healthy pedophilia" is unacceptable. Most American parents have not heard of the leftist contraption to excuse sex with children. Most attachment parenting in the children's rights community eschew of "healthy pedophilia". However, a few platforms and homes still support it behind the scenes.

Why is "healthy pedophilia" immoral? See 1 Corinthians 6:18-20 KJV:

Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body, but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body. Why? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own? For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God with your body, and in your spirit, which are God's.

The Greek root word translated "fornication" is πορνεία (Latin: porneia) and most literally translates to "outside of proper channels". The proper channels here are a lawfully-sanctioned marriage between one adult man and one adult woman. Sexual relations in a marriage, especially the consummation, signs the marriage contract on the dotted line. Thus, any sexual relations outside of marriage constitute a fraudulent marriage, thus defiling the groom next to the bride. 

Marriages between parent and child are prohibited in the Bible. See Leviticus 18:17 KJV:

Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of a mother and her daughter, neither shalt thou take her son's daughter, or her daughter's daughter, for they are her near kinswomen: it is wickedness.

 And Leviticus 20:13 KJV:

If a man also lieth with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death, their death shall be upon them.

Both these verses were interpreted under the Law of Moses as prohibiting child sexual abuse. Actual child sexual abuse was very rare in Ancient Israel, even in the form of sodomy, but when it did happen, it was dealt with swiftly, and was a moral outrage.

A common argument for the lawful sexual abuse of a child, known euphemistically as "healthy pedophilia", is that attachment parenting fathers lack entitlement, and so it will do no long-term harm. The fact of the matter is that the child usually does not enjoy being subject to sexual violence and harassment in the home.

What should fathers do instead for parent attraction? Parent attraction is a form of parental entitlement that can easily be dealt with using masturbatory fantasy about one's child. Then, you can actually have a willing child all to yourself. Sexually assaulting a child in a lawful manner is unacceptable to God.

The left wants to legalize sex with children. Even today, there are loopholes in pretty much every state's criminal code allowing for certain forms of incest. In Pennsylvania, all sex with a child is illegal, meaning the very same opposite. The left believes that a completely non-entitled adult like myself would not harm a child sexually. The problem with that is that we need norms in this country, and we need to draw the line somewhere. Sure, some of us adults have zero entitlement in relation to children, but a lot of other bad people could jump on board as well, and those adults could well be very entitled, or else non-entitled in an entitled way. 

Most of us adults who lack entitlement in relation to children actually don't want sex with children except at the very lowest level of us, meaning the thread level, meaning we are content with sexual fantasies of children. I support norms keeping children away from the sexual lair of adults, even if it doesn't harm them, because it is wrong as a moral absolute. We need more moral absolutes in our society such as that. Just use your hand to get out those juices. Don't use a child.

The depraved and decadent, defiled sexual perverts and miscreants who sexually assault children within the law will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them burn in torrents of Hell-fire! Repent!