Thursday, July 28, 2022

The age of consent: Why 16 is too low for Pennsylvania children

Many people think that the age of consent in Pennsylvania and across the United States is 18. This is a common belief that is false among Pennsylvania parents and other adults. The fact of the matter is that the age of consent is 16 in Pennsylvania, as it is in most states. Children should not even be having sex. We need a higher age of consent, meaning it should be raised to 18 in Pennsylvania.

There is a simple reason why the age of consent should be at age 18. Anyone other than the parents who comes into contact with a child is a parent in loco parentis. "In loco parentis" translates from the Latin to "in place of parents", meaning adults other than parents who come into contact with children are acting in place of their parents. Thus, sex with children is a conflict of interest, and thus, should be banned entirely.

In Ancient Judeo-Christian culture, sexual relations were seen as something adult, meaning children weren't allowed by parents to even have sex with each other. It says in 1 Corinthians 6:18 KJV:

Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.

The Greek root word translated "fornication" is πορνεία (Latin: porneia) and lifts up all of the sex crime laws in the Law of Moses, enumerated. There was an age of consent then, and it corresponded with the age of majority. The age of majority was the age of consent then. Therefore, the age of majority should be the age of consent in all jurisdictions, as sex, in the biblical tense, is an adult act to be saved for a marriage between an adult man and an adult woman. Children shouldn't even be having sex, and that was the view of the ancients.

The age of consent in Pennsylvania is too low. A child that age is not ready to make a decision as big as to have sex, with anyone. Children should be protected by their parents from sexuality and promiscuity, and if they end up having sex, the parents should be prosecuted for allowing their child to have sex. All a parent has to do is be there and supervise, and then they don't have sex. This was the attitude of the ancients. In Ancient Judeo-Christian culture, it was the parents who were charged when children had sex with each other prematurely and outside of marriage. I support abstinence for children, and there are encouraging ways to teach it, meaning redirecting sexual wants to masturbation, so that it becomes a habit to go there instead of there. 

The depraved and decadent, defiled adult fornicators of children will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them BURN in torrents of Hell-fire! Repent!

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Time-in: Why mammary closeness is the biblical way of doing time-in

Many parents think that time-out is a safe alternative to corporal punishment of children. This is a common attitude amongst American parent...