Sunday, December 26, 2021

Involving the investigation of my advocacy platform

I am currently under investigation for vague allegations of religious sexual abuse, meaning vague by my understanding. I am sure that if I find out what I was charged with fully, I'd be horrified. This doesn't mean I am some saint in this regard.

I did commit one moral crime that opened up the investigation - fornication by way of false marriage. It was with a cousin, in an attic, and involved antisocial "rough-play" with the wrong motives. I will admit that I touched her with intent to play around recklessly, but my playfulness was sexually motivated.

I think it was handled wrong, in my humble opinion. The police should have just taken the report, and if something happened again, cited me $300 for summary harassment, as my intent was reckless in nature, and a form of physical battery under the English common law. The way the common law statute of battery is handled in Pennsylvania is through a decriminalized route, meaning there has to be a warning, then a citation, and prison is only an option for repeated offenses that have been documented.

I respected the boundaries of my cousin, then with her being 12, hence why no summary charges are warranted now, as if they could be pressed now, as the statute of limitations on summary harassment is 90 days.

I am judging the police based on the law that they enforce, and that only. I am not to have a personal opinion about the civil rights of children as victims or as perpetrators (my cousin was falsely alleged by some officers as the perpetrator). 

I believe in full openness, transparency, and honesty, as an advocate for children that is humble and shamefaced in nature. I don't believe in defiance against the rights of children to stay in business. The way to stay in business is to admit everything you did, and then point out what you didn't do. I am not entitled to anything from a child, so if I mess up, admit it, as anyone is capable of making an entitled and abusive choice towards children under the right/wrong conditions. All adults have abused a child at some point or another in their lives, or at least have condoned it, so all adults must take responsibility, as I did. I was an abusive parent to my cousin, meaning an adult in that situation, as there was inequality.

I am spared under the law of the land, but God's Law is even stricter. Fornication is a fraudulent marriage in this individual case, meaning I wanted to play, and I touched a child with that motive. I did not force myself, which is why the police thankfully are not pressing charges. My cousin blames herself for all this. She shouldn't. I was foolhardy and downright dumb for doing what I did. I do apologize, as I was wrong in how I treated her, and deserve her hatred, and am grateful that she does not hate me.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Righteous co-sleeping: Why God wants parents to sleep next to their children

Many parents think that co-sleeping is the irresponsible choice for a parent to make. This is a common attitude from American parents. Most ...