Many parents hate pedophiles with a vengeance. They hate children on one side of them, and pedophiles on the other. Why is this? Attachment theory. A pedophile is a child inside an adult's body, with their attractions being an extension of their immaturity, usually autistic in nature. Gentle parents are the most humane people to pedophiles on earth, if given a chance.
According to attachment research, pedophilia, when disclosed, elicits a parental response, namely the same reaction the other person would have if their own child disclosed their pedophilic children to them. Parents tend to treat pedophiles like they do their own children, and support and hold them accountable like they would their own children. If parents are punitive with children, they won't care about pedophiles, meaning they will hate a pedophile, preying on them even when vulnerably disclosing. This is how they feel about their child when they cry.
In my experience in disclosing my pedophilic condition to others, the majority of people who were understanding were anti-spanking, meaning gentle parents. They tend to mourn, and think it is sad. At worst, they deny it. They react to you like a child, but in a way that you can say anything to them, and they will listen like a good parent should.
A good gauge as to how children are treated is how pedophiles are treated by the same parent(s). If pedophiles are punished merely for existing, children must be punished for being children. The same works vice-versa. Some of our most skilled gentle, non-violent parents are also supportive of non-offending pedophiles.
Gentle parents do not hate pedophiles. They hate child abuse, meaning we as a community believe that the abusers should have no label to victimize themselves with, meaning the label "pedophile" should go to those who need it and aren't violating the law or abusing children. Gentle parents do not hate pedophiles because they don't hate their children. Since they listen to children, their reaction to pedophile immaturity, when in naturally attached form, is the same listening reaction they have to children. The reason a gentle parent may hate pedophiles is due to jealous male influence, whereas a near-exclusive pedophile like me sure isn't here for the women.
Pedophile acceptance is here in some parts of the country, namely Northern, liberal states such as here in Pennsylvania. "Acceptance" here means clinical acceptance, meaning people will hear it out as a mental health condition. The people here who are understanding are the same people who oppose spanking and corporal punishment, because they are gentle with their chronological children, so they will be patient with pedophiles, knowing some are non-offending. It is a low-level awareness that chases alongside the anti-spanking and gentle parenting compound, with parents sparing non-offending pedophiles like they do their children.
This blog, Opposing Parental Entitlement, markets itself as the first pedophile to be open in a children's rights movement about their mental health condition, and then they find anti-spanking advice. Most parents in the United States go to religious sources for advice, hence why I format my views the way I do. They are especially formatted for conservative theology, meaning strict adherence to Scripture based on the doctrine of original sin. I make my arguments irrefutable to any pro-spanking parent, in order to burn them to decay their pro-spanking narcissist. There is absolutely no credible evidence that the Bible commands spanking, meaning none whatsoever - I laugh when people point to a single verse such as those in Proverbs or Hebrews, or quote a grotesque poem like it is a Bible verse. I am a pedophile survivor, meaning pedophile makes me constantly aware of my trauma at some level, and can call it up to blare it any time I need to. Otherwise, the anger is centered, and I am always angry at some level. Let the entitled parents who hate both children and pedophiles BURN!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.