Tuesday, September 21, 2021

Child Protective Services: Why parents have duties, not rights

I stand by them, when nobody else does. Thank your local Children and Youth Services caseworker, dear fellow Pennsylvanians, and if you refuse to and stamp on your hat while in this establishment, you flag yourself as the enemy to all children everywhere - their parents. Wanna bet?

Most parents think they have rights. The highest power in the power is the Constitution, and said document holds "equal protection of the laws" between children and adults, which isn't recognized yet due to adult biased rulings bringing up "temporary status" which is irrelevant. See Romans 13:1-4 KJV:

Let every soul be subject to unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive of themselves damnation. For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: For he is the minister of God for thee for good. But if thou do which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth the sword not in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil. 

Parents must heed their duties. Under Pennsylvania law, that simply means do not injure or sexually abuse your child. The rest is stated in natural law, meaning children's civil liberties, as commanded by God's Law, which is above the law of the land, and governs a child's liberty from assault and battery. It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents, with parents sacrificing themselves for children in the spirit that Christ sacrificed for His children, turning Himself into His children for a crime He didn't commit, suffering the full penalty...with children resting securely in this parental sacrifice and martyrdom. The Greek root word υπακουο uplifts a specific biblical parenting context that is attachment-based in nature, meaning to the level of nudity, with mothers and children both being unclothed while inside a home, and young children being swaddled to the bosom of mothers until age 3, or even older, with children sleeping next to their children until adulthood. The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to the moral statute forbidding a provocation to anger against one's neighbor, with children included as one's neighbor. This was a command from God handed down by the Apostle Paul banning spanking and corporal punishment. The rod of correction in the Old Testament and Hebrews referred indirectly to judicial corporal punishment under the Mosaic Law, meaning 40 minus 1 lashes to the bare back (not the buttocks) as a last warning before being put to death, with most who were whipped being murderers or child abusers - the grandparents stepping in and grandpa giving his adult son a good whipping for abusing the grandkids. That avenue, however, did not exist in the New Testament, with the consequence being logical, in the form of excommunication and collective shunning, meaning punitive parents were banned then. See 1 Corinthians 5:11 KJV:

But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolator, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with one an no not to eat.

Some people you just have to ban. Parents, meaning the evil ones who identify, are on that list, as we know why you hide behind that glorified title. I shun pro-spanking parents in order not to enable their evil, and only allow them back when they drop the subject with me. The secular law should serve this function, but it doesn't. So, we need to enlist the natural law, as the civil liberties of children are under attack from all sides of the political spectrum, in a concerted effort of adults lining up against children that can be no better explained as mankind's original sin against the least among us. Ban all of that crap, and the parents who identify by it.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Passing down the faith: How to bring up children in the Lord the right way (meaning without punishment or force)

Many parents know that children need religion. However, most parents think that this means that children need religion beaten into them. How...