Thursday, August 19, 2021

Pro-social guilty conscience - Why parents should feel guilty for their existence (alongside ALL adults)

Many parents have a guilty conscience around their child, meaning usually an antisocial one of a traumatic nature. Trauma and alcoholism contributed to my abuse, not narcissism or pedophilia. Most parents repress trauma in a way that comes out sideways against children, whereas pedophilic parents simply use an inappropriate "relationship" with a child to escape from traumatic reality, with both being antisocial traumatic dissociation. I have a pro-social guilty conscience in relation to children.

It says in John 7:24 KJV:

Judge not by the appearance, but by righteous judgment.

The Greek root word translated "judge" and "judgment" is κρινο (Latin: krino) and refers to the judgment standard under the Mosaic Law, which involved the presumption of innocence beyond a reasonable doubt, with due suspicion "beyond what the eye can see", meaning presume your neighbor innocent, but presume at another level that evil can exist in everyone, because evil can exist in anyone at some level. If in question about your own motives around a child, however, presume the worst in terms of intent. 

The idea is that you should not assume you mean well in relation to children, in a prideful manner, as no adult truly means well in relation to children. They can strive to, but they'll never get there. I presume my motives to be guilty until proven innocent beyond a reasonable doubt. This, no doubt, can switch to innocent very quickly with enough self-control and mental clarity gauged, but if it cannot be gauged in any way, meaning if I see any unlawful and entitled ulterior motives that lead to sin and abuse against child, I either find more pro-social reasons, or not see a child at all.

It says in 1 Thessalonians 5:22 KJV:

Abstain from all appearance of evil.

The Greek root word translated "appearance" is εἴδος (Latin: eidos) refers to the opportunity of evil appearing before you, and this refers to staying as far from the line as possible from punishing, controlling, or sexually objectifying your child through entitled actions. This refers to pro-social self-prophecy. Pro-social prophecy in a pro-social peacekeeper involves ALL of the variables being calculated to predict accurately for a gaslighting investigation. Pro-social self-prophecy involves planning to abuse your child in order to not abuse them. It is a stand-tall mindset that allows you to imagine what you'll do, say, in your child's room or in the bathroom with a child, and then planning ahead of time to avoid such places at triggering times. This is how a pedophile like me is a gentle parent towards children. All this comes with the pro-social presumption of guilt in myself, meaning hypothetical assumption that your nature is flawed, so that you are capable of the worst harm imaginable towards your child, so plan accordingly to protect your child from harm and abuse from your own hands.

My guess is that with a physically aggressive parent, it would be more about avoiding conversations. I avoid ALL conversation with a child unless they are the one's chatting me up, thus THEY have to verbally consent to verbal conversation. Pro-social avoidance/escape is a gentle parenting acronym, usually in terms of parent anger, in which parents are commanded to spare children their anger (Matt. 5:21-22; Eph. 6:4; Col. 6:4). Pedophiles are also commanded to avoid parental entitlement, meaning adult sexual entitlement in this case, by prophesying their hypothetical abuse of children, and defying the prophesy in a humble type of morale, yet looking upon the landscape, seeing the fruits of your self-labor, in gratitude for one's own protective actions towards one's child. It says in Hebrews 12:11 KJV:

Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby.

The Greek root word translated "grievous" is λυπε (Latin: lupe) and refers to emotional grief, meaning NOT pain from any sort of corporal punishment or other harsh treatment as a child. This verse concerns parents, not children. The Greek root word translated "chastening" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to the chastening of the Lord, meaning being struck with reverent fear leading to conviction to discipline and center oneself in relation to children, leading to good works, then love, with love being denoted by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and referring to acts of service for children coming from Christian conviction. This Christian conviction leads to mutual submission in the family home between parents and children. It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your children in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to providing custody, which was a form of rest in the love and grace of parents, meaning vulnerable trust in parents, enough for children to demand the every need of themselves supplied, especially attachment needs, with children owing nothing in relation to children, but nonetheless emulating their parents' example out of gratitude for their every provision in terms of needs. The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to the offenses in the legal context of the Bible, namely dereliction of duty to protect by way of provocation to anger, which could include, and often did, corporal punishment of a child. Basically, the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child is abuse, when coupled with entitled intent that is willful or reckless in nature. This moral law can be applied in any way or all ways applicable and prudent for the promotion of the rights of the child, specifically here the right of the child not to be abused in any way, shape, or form.

The depraved and entitled parents will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them burn in the lake of fire and brimstone, which is the second death! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Birth nudity: Why God wants birth nudity in the family home

Many parents believe that children deserve punishment when they cry. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American paren...