Monday, July 12, 2021

Pro-social alienation: Good motivation for pro-spanking parents (the ultimate objective of Opposing Parental Entitlement)

Many parents hate their children...and I hate them back, on behalf of children. We live in a slave society that keeps down children, keeping them down with the jackboot of adult authority and hegemony that keeps children outside the sphere of societal inclusion. We all lay our arms down, in relation to children, surrendering to them, submitting to God and being born through them.

It says in 1 Corinthians 5:11 KJV:

But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be called a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolator, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with one an no not to eat.

The core offense here, whereof all others stem from, is entitlement, as denoted by the Greek root word πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektes) and refers to parental entitlement in this context, meaning the attitude of "I am a good parent, and I have rights over my children" and leads to wanting things from children, or wanting children to do things, to the point of seeking to impose said want onto a child, leading to abuse/theft as perceived by the child. The maximum punishment is refusing to eat with someone who is an abuser or sinner, or is entitled in any way, whereas one can shun speech and association, being the modern equivalent of refusing dinner. Meaning, I'll just not associate with people who identify as parents through their stated pro-spanking views. 

Every single adult, by default, is guilty merely for existing in relation to children, and is deserving of DEATH and DESTRUCTION for said wretched existence. Only gentle parents will be saved, unless a parent or adult can redeem themselves by seeking evidence against controlling and punitive, and/or permissive tendencies in themselves towards children, namely by stating anti-spanking views of any sort, or else non-spanking views of any sort. It says in Matthew 20:16 KJV:

So the last shall be first, and the first last: for many be called, but few chosen.

Children's rights is a process of elimination, but one that presumes innocence. It says in John 7:24 KJV:

Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.

The Greek root word translated both "judge" and "judgment" is κνιρο (Latin: krino) and refers to the presumption of innocence beyond a reasonable doubt. Righteous judgment here involves discerning the sheep and the goats, the entitled and non-entitled among adults, with the entitled adults going "down" and the non-entitled adults going "up", with entitlement being defending punishment, control, or maltreatment of a child as a "right".

The idea is not to enable pro-spanking vices in parents, meaning if parents are not open to anti-spanking beliefs at the very least, shun them by a speech ban. Acknowledge them politely, of course, when they strike up conversation, but stop the conversation short, meaning they will never have another lengthy conversation again with them again if they reek of a pro-spanking parent, pushing their shopping cart, card reader, shouting at their children with the Bible in their car that they fail to read about how to be a good parent. Rods weren't intended for children, but their abusers, in fact. Then chenek when it happened again. 

We want a dividing line between pro-spanking America and anti-spanking America, with children's rights referring to the compound, with mass expansion alongside changed minds, wiping pro-spanking filth from the face of society, erasing all child abuse from all existence, like fire engulfing a fallen world, cleansing it of pro-spanking filthiness and ragweed, extinguishing all false parents from existence, with the gentle parents repopulating the earth, leaving children to be judge and jury over all adults in their life, for children are the most credible of witnesses for their own safety. Adults shall study the word proper in silence, while the children enjoy freedom, learning by example from parents...Shove pro-spanking anti-children's right's into the fringes of society, criminalize them as parents, infringing on their parental rights with pride and gusto, knowing it undermines "traditional" parenting, priding ourselves for the righteous offense imposed on parents. We will ban you parents on the pro-spanking side, and remove your parental rights, as is your worst fear, as we will ensure that you realize, for our own traumatic sadism's sake. Pro-social psychopathy. Pro-social children's rights tyranny/hegemony/oppression. Oppress pro-spanking parents, and pride oneself in their victimizing cries, silencing them and smothering their voice for all time, setting the record straight that children have rights, and parents have duties.

Shopping cart, leading to mob justice, meaning parents hanged. Police too afraid to do anything. Viva la anti-spanking revolution, for we will conquer this nation and destroy all anti-child faculties within it, and we know you are scared when you defend otherwise by waving your hands in their. FOOK parents, meaning all of them, at least in extension cord format. I'm okay with the gentle parenting individuals, and celebrate our existence. "Really, you exist?" I said as I joined StopSpanking.org's Facebook page. I might have gained a tear or two of joy. Finally, people who think like I do.

 


No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Child discipline: Why proper child discipline involves praise and encouragement (as opposed to punishment and force)

Many parents believe children should have discipline in their lives. This is a common attitude amongst Americans parents. Most American pare...