Saturday, June 12, 2021

Copy of Facebook evidenciary post

Copied from Facebook, in case it gets taken down by another report. I find it fishy that it was deleted in the first place, but I keep back accusation. I can suspect anyone and everyone of being guilty of something. Maybe it is something specific that I suspect. My anger doesn't go off on the defendant until the last day, when I am certain that they are the perpetrator they are presenting to me, and then I gaslight them down. But, if you have nothing to hide or show, you have nothing to worry about. "Show" gives credence to the existence of lawful abuse. 

I do get mass reports from time to time, as I am not the most popular advocate out there. Focus on the Family manufactured this idea about an opposite narcissist to scare others in order to be able to track my development my whole life. Focus on the Family, as an organization, is my arch enemy for its mere existence as an entitled organizational parent in relation to children. I do not think Dr. Toole even works there. He works at the ACLU defending the rights of sex offenders. Once you leave prison for such a thing, you do have rights in my view, but only if you work the program, which might mean going against it a little bit if you think other coping strategies work.


"Opposite" narcissism is a 0/100 peacekeeper solely in terms of anger, meaning I can have momentary flashes of anger, whereas I am usually calm and centered in terms of my personality.

I later switch back, and forget that I was angry in the past. Basically, the type of sudden anger associated with autism, or when a survivor turns on their abuser. It seems anti-CR is trying to make pathological our trauma in a silencing way. That sort of sudden, convicting anger is a sign of trauma, meaning they have a narcissist. They aren't narcissists.
Second try at explaining. Alan Toole has the first post documenting this deleted. I apologize if these facts about me are threatening to his "survivor" trauma, as this perceived threat is not intended. I am not gaslighting you when I say "parents" but others who support punitive parent. You were an egalitarian parent, but not the best one. But, you weren't the worst parent in the country, from what I can tell, and since you can admit you made some mistakes, I don't think you are entitled in that regard, which shapes my view, in terms of point of entitlement, about everything about you. If you respect children, that sheds new light on everything else about you, meaning if you struggle elsewhere, you can improve.
0
People Reached
0
Engagements
Distribution Score
1 Comment
Like
Comment
Share

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Time-in: Why mammary closeness is the biblical way of doing time-in

Many parents think that time-out is a safe alternative to corporal punishment of children. This is a common attitude amongst American parent...