Many parents here at children's rights are worried about me being judgmental about gentle parents. Apparently, very few understand how the concept of line of intent under my conservative Christian beliefs.
It says in Exodus 20:17 KJV:
Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor anything that is thy neighbour's.
Sin is damages, meaning harm imposed on a child by means of pain, shame, emotional distress, loss of property/tokens, defamation of character, and/or fornication. Damages usually come from some intent, with coveting being denoted by the Hebrew word לחמוד (Latin: lachmod) and refers not only to wanting things from others, but wanting things to the point of seeking to impose said want on another, leading to theft/abuse.
The Greek root word cross-referencing the Tenth Commandment, referring to entitlement, is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to entitlement as a whole in parenting, meaning a demanding, controlling, and/or spousifying attitude towards one's child, leading to the theft/abuse. Child abuse, at bare minimum, is a child being offended by the actions of an adult towards them, meaning feeling controlled, manipulated, or cornered.
Biblical law looks for a specific intent, namely one to impose selfish demands on a child, namely out of convenience or entitled frustration. Seeing the child, at any level, as a wastebasket for your negative emotions is entitlement. But, the moment you apologize and make amends with your child, you cease to be entitled. You still are guilty of abuse, but it is forgiven, and should be resolved within a domestic setting.
Abuse exists in most parent-child relationships, and most of it in the United States is entitled abuse, meaning parents defend their "high seat", meaning their position of power and control, blaming marginalized minorities for their entitlement.
Nope. the pro-spanking parents will burn, not you. "Pro-spanking" refers to an ideology endorsed by a parent as an excuse for entitlement. I am really opposed to the ideology, but name all identified parents as suspects. You would have to say "I am" next to "parent" in defensive mode about your parenting choices. Protection is irrelevant, as refusing to protect your child in any way is entitlement. Most parents fail at protecting their child, and abuse their child, usually protected by "defenses" excusing violence as "reasonable within the circumstances". These laws need to be struck. Spanking is already banned here in the United States, as America is a Christian nation, and was founded upon Judeo-Christian family values...This movement is reminiscent of my time in Iceland, meaning despite a secular facade, most people here support Judeo-Christian values at the core minimum of acknowledging their risk to children, and turning protection inwards. I actually can see conservatives taking on the cause, in due time. It will be banned, given the pace things are going around the world. It simply is a matter of when.
I don't judge gentle parents for their mistakes, but may find conversation about going off the wagon to be a bit draining, so I have to avoid them myself, because they are necessary for the struggling parent. A parental rights trauma involves an ability, once mastered, to avoid offensive speech. Say whatever the heck you want on your page, and I'll butt out of it. I only enforce triggers that benefit others, meaning you don't need to point out pedophiles, as only child sexual abusers abuse children. Only child rapists rape children. Pedophiles are more likely to be the victims, meaning they are either really narcissistic or really vulnerable, with most at VirPed being vulnerable, and the bulk being psychology narcissists (meaning in this context fully aware), as am I. Pedophiles are likely represented in the medical and therapeutic professions concerning children, much like us. Why not include them, in spirit? That pedophile stance has nothing to do with how I see gentle parents, and a true non-offending pedophile is a gentle parent from birth, that may need some adjustments in self-esteem (otherwise the nerd that hates themselves).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.