Pro-social harm, pro-social evil - How I define it

 I am a pro-social harm, pro-social evil advocate towards parents. A parent can carry many definitions, narrow and broad. Symbolic parents are those who control others from top to bottom like an authoritarian or authoritative parent would, like a T, with the proposed child underneath.

The idea is to bring the T beneath you, in tears, and lay into them using pro-social predation anger how hurts and offended you are, in a pro-social manner, you are by their actions, meaning you intend harm to model harm inflicted, with the ultimate goal to get the abuser to walk away from the situation, then humbly thanking them for their grace, or else shouting at them on the way out so they know their place.

I can define anything as abuse, but tend to turn the other cheek in arguments, and would just walk away in an Internet exchange. When I perceive others trying to corner me in my abode, where I have hunkered down, I become belligerent and abusive in a pro-social manner to drive out the intruders, who are merely altars. They are on trial, meaning the real persons behind the altars, as the altars, by default until specifically and credibly stated otherwise, are deemed exact replicas of the culprits and abusers. When they finally leave, I go right back up in terms of conditioning, and it is a huge relief.

If this were something out in the open, and I was not cornered, and these were real people instead, I'd maneuver to ignore them, and if they followed me, then wind them up before leaving, to show that their presence was perceived as a menace and thus harassment. The tape is set up that the victim challenge is instead to "get the howlers off your doorstep".

Did you intend to appear to be some howler? "No" Well that's how you three were perceived, nonetheless. Since you didn't intend that appearance, and intended shear terror to evict "a demon to inflict harm", I don't think you are guilty, as you thought I was plotting against a child. Plotting against a child would be done through a writing that would rationalize the harm, or by begging to my mom detected in the house. Yes, it's that easy to see. It's literally on the surface, and I wear it there for full transparency purposes. 

My alarm bells sounded because these were known molestation tactics by a bigger parent inflicted on a younger "kid", meaning they must have had the intent to molest me at any level, and I would not stand for that. Pro-social evil is intended to counter evil with evil, and I perceived evil in the methodology used, and thus the need to defend myself, or else inflict an abuser on me to show intent to abuse directly.

Using evil, meaning callous and unfeeling tactics, unprovoked, is not pro-social evil, but simply evil. When you are cornering me in that box, I don't care whether you live or die because you are so evil to me, because of the evil you replicate. I HATE being lumped in with that scum, so I appear like the abuser, but different in a selfless way that shows my victimhood. No abuser would gaslight that way, and not even my former abuser self. I would have instead made rights demands. "Maybe we replaced some words" I was not made aware of this, do clarify "We want you out". Then you had intent to molest a child, but saw a pedophile as an easy alternate target, and that is the motives I am projecting onto you, pinning the tail on the donkey since that analogy might get under your skin. Stay off my doorstep, and quit howling like a dog, because that's how I saw all three of you, while I was bare naked...They can be shown to the whole group that is in favor of me, if it is deemed appropriate, of course naturally edited to not oppose community standards. Up to admin at Christians Against Corporal Punishment and other groups in my favor. That was horrendous.

I wouldn't use these molestation tactics. I would simply hang out at the child's house, or invite them to my house, and slowly "overstay my welcome", grabbing things, usually by trying to hug when the child wants to, perhaps, get a drink from the fridge, and whining in the process, wanting antisocial "company", meaning "connection" without consent of the child. Those helicopter tactics more replicate MY childhood than anything, as my father was a helicopter father and spanked me for the reason you would spank - to punish me for being a possible victim of child abduction. He was "worried" in an antisocial manner, but for the right reasons, as the moral crime of antisocial "worry" usually goes. I would never be a helicopter over a child, merely because I hated it. Let them make their own mistakes. "We just didn't want him to fantasize about Gina and then leave to go see her" long walk, and mom won't drive me. Excuses enough, given how immoral that would be to do to her. She doesn't have to consent to any of that. "Then you take away our reason to molest you, then we're mad". We won't molest you or anyone in return, for we are Christians and ignore you to show your grace. Thank you for blocking me to set a limit and boundary with me, Nadine, as I appreciate knowing the limits.