I am frustrated with your antics lately, but if you think I would kill you, you have got me wrong. Apparently, some wise-allacks in the law enforcement and anti-children's rights establishments are trying to scare you to create/promote a co-victim situation...They want you to get mad at me, so that they have a show. They don't put on a show for us - we put on a show for them, at least in this instance.
If you had any posts from an account in my name, know that it wasn't from me. You can check the cameras on my computer and electronics, and you may find that I slept through the whole night. "Then he was that quick" watch the whole footage, not just one hour. I was asleep, the whole time.
Keep in mind, also, that tapes have a certain script to them, intended to make either or both of us incredulous, forgetting that such is not a real life exchange. I see it as shouting in thin air at a replica of a person, and merely use it to gauge their intent towards me in terms of harm. The idea is that someone who meant well and not harm would simply say "okay, I'll leave you alone" and end the tape. Since they say "I can't leave" they admit to harassment. I picture a door-loitering situation, and them shouting them down.
The police need a bit more than that, I'd assume, to make an arrest or issue a citation, but it sure shows the length some would go to control others. I am better than them, and take the high road. I don't go to their pages, and anytime I am seen there, it is another spare account of mine that was taken over. Facebook internationally blocked me out of them to give me an alibi.
I don't rule over this movement. My advocacy just lives in it. If any "Max" tells you such, he's lying because he doesn't exist. Look for the profile picture with the street picture in Iceland - that's my account, and if you see THAT account making nasty threats, let me know since they now have hacked THAT account.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.